Pepeu Giancarlo, Giovannini Maria Grazia
Department of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2009 Apr;6(2):86-96. doi: 10.2174/156720509787602861.
Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) were introduced in the therapy of Alzheimer Disease (AD) in the nineteen nineties with great expectations. The hopes and large interest raised by these drugs are well demonstrated by 12,000 references listed by PubMed under 'ChEI' for 1995-2007. The list is reduced to 2500 if we confine ourselves to 'ChEIs and dementia'. Of them, about 500 were published in the last two years. Whereas an increase in brain acetylcholine and an improvement of cognitive deficits have been consistently demonstrated in animal models of AD, from aging rats to transgenic mice, the clinical effectiveness of ChEIs has been and is still a matter of contrasting opinions. These range from the negative conclusions of the AD2000 trial on donepezil, claiming that it is not cost effective, with benefits below a minimally relevant threshold, to the NICE appraisal of 2007 declaring that donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine are efficacious for mild to moderate AD, irrespective of their different selectivity for acetyl- (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). The possibility that ChEIs may exert their effects through mechanisms beyond cholinesterase inhibition has been envisaged. However, according to the information presented in this review, the "classical" ChEIs, donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine, show no pharmacological actions beyond cholinesterase inhibition which may play an important role in their therapeutic efficacy. The diverging opinions on clinical efficacy do not discourage from developing new ChEIs, and particularly the so called multifunctional ChEIs. They represent the future of the cholinergic therapy for AD but other indications for these drugs may be considered, including vascular dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and the ethically sensitive improvement of memory and learning in healthy subjects.
胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChEIs)于20世纪90年代被引入阿尔茨海默病(AD)的治疗,人们寄予厚望。1995年至2007年期间,PubMed列出的关于“ChEI”的参考文献有12000条,充分证明了这些药物引发的希望和广泛关注。如果我们将范围限定在“ChEIs与痴呆症”,这个列表就缩减到了2500条。其中,大约500条是在过去两年发表的。尽管在从衰老大鼠到转基因小鼠的AD动物模型中,一直都证明脑内乙酰胆碱增加以及认知缺陷得到改善,但ChEIs的临床疗效一直存在争议。这些观点从AD2000试验关于多奈哌齐的负面结论(声称其不具有成本效益,益处低于最小相关阈值)到2007年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的评估(宣称多奈哌齐、卡巴拉汀、加兰他敏对轻度至中度AD有效,无论它们对乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)和丁酰胆碱酯酶(BuChE)的不同选择性如何)。人们已经设想ChEIs可能通过胆碱酯酶抑制以外的机制发挥作用。然而,根据本综述提供的信息,“经典”的ChEIs,即多奈哌齐、卡巴拉汀和加兰他敏,除了胆碱酯酶抑制作用外,没有显示出可能对其治疗效果起重要作用的药理作用。关于临床疗效的不同观点并没有阻碍新型ChEIs的研发,特别是所谓的多功能ChEIs。它们代表了AD胆碱能治疗的未来,但这些药物的其他适应症也可以考虑,包括血管性痴呆、轻度认知障碍以及健康受试者记忆和学习方面符合伦理敏感性的改善。