Tarawneh Rawan, Holtzman David M
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2009 Apr;8(2):144-59. doi: 10.2174/187152709787847324.
Over the last 10 years, promising data has emerged from both animal and human studies that both active immunization with amyloid-beta (Abeta) as well as passive immunization with anti-Abeta antibodies offer promise as therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Data from animal models suggests that antibodies to Abeta through several mechanisms can decrease Abeta deposition, decrease Abeta -associated damage such as dystrophic neurite formation, and improve behavioral performance. Data from human studies suggests that active immunization can result in plaque clearance and that passive immunotherapy might result in slowing of cognitive decline. Despite this, a recent analysis from a phase I trial that involved active immunization with Abeta42, while not powered to determine efficacy, suggested no large effect of active immunization despite the fact that plaque clearance was very prominent in some subjects. An important issue to consider is when active or passive immunization targeting Abeta has the chance to be most effective. Clinico-pathological and biomarker studies have shown that in terms of the time course of AD, Abeta deposition probably begins about 10-15 years prior to symptom onset (preclinical AD) and that tau aggregation in tangles and in neurites does not begin to accelerate and build up in larger amounts in the neocortex until just prior to symptom onset. By the time the earliest clinical signs of AD emerge, Abeta deposition may be close to reaching its peak and tangle formation and neuronal cell loss is substantial though still not at its maximal extent. Since immunization targeting Abeta does not appear to have major effects on tangle pathology, for immunization to have the most chance for success, performing clinical trials in individuals who are cognitively only very mildly impaired or even in those with preclinical AD would likely offer a much better chance for success. Current work with AD biomarkers suggests that such individuals can now be identified and it seems likely that targeting this population with immunization strategies targeting Abeta would offer the best chance of success.
在过去十年中,动物和人体研究均已出现有前景的数据,表明用β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)进行主动免疫以及用抗Aβ抗体进行被动免疫都有望成为治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的方法。动物模型的数据表明,针对Aβ的抗体可通过多种机制减少Aβ沉积,减少与Aβ相关的损伤,如营养不良性神经突形成,并改善行为表现。人体研究的数据表明,主动免疫可导致斑块清除,而被动免疫疗法可能会减缓认知衰退。尽管如此,一项涉及用Aβ42进行主动免疫的I期试验的近期分析表明,虽然该试验没有足够的能力来确定疗效,但尽管在一些受试者中斑块清除非常显著,主动免疫却没有产生很大效果。需要考虑的一个重要问题是,针对Aβ的主动或被动免疫何时最有可能有效。临床病理和生物标志物研究表明,就AD的病程而言,Aβ沉积可能在症状出现前约10 - 15年开始(临床前AD),并且缠结和神经突中的tau聚集直到症状出现前才开始在新皮质中加速并大量积累。到AD最早的临床症状出现时,Aβ沉积可能已接近达到峰值,缠结形成和神经元细胞丢失很严重,尽管仍未达到最大程度。由于针对Aβ的免疫似乎对缠结病理没有重大影响,为了使免疫最有可能成功,在认知仅轻度受损的个体甚至临床前AD个体中进行临床试验可能会有更好的成功机会。目前对AD生物标志物的研究表明,现在可以识别出这类个体,并且用针对Aβ的免疫策略针对这一人群似乎最有可能成功。