Suppr超能文献

定量支气管镜灌洗培养(B-BAL)与盲插鼻胃管灌洗(N-BAL)培养在呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)诊断中的比较。

Comparison of quantitative bronchoscopic lavage cultures (B-BAL) with blind NG tube lavage (N-BAL) cultures in the diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP).

作者信息

Hussain Salma Muhammad, Abubaker Jawed, Ali Muhammad, Noor Asim, Khurshid Moazzam, Dildar Babar, Khan Safdar G

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Apr;19(4):245-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare quantitative Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage (B-BAL) cultures with blind nasogastric tube bronchoalveolar lavage (N-BAL) cultures in the diagnosis of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparative study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

The study was conducted in Medical ICU and Chest ICU at Liaquat National Hospital (LNH), Karachi, from January till August, 2007.

METHODOLOGY

Patients admitted in ICU with clinical suspicion of VAP, fulfilling inclusion criteria viz. fever, leukocytosis, new or worsening infiltrate in chest radiograph or purulent secretions were included. Exclusion criteria were deranged coagulopathy, extreme ventilatory and oxygenation demands and tracheal obstruction. All patients had N-BAL using 16 fr Nasogastric tube (NG) without lubrication followed by B-BAL. Samples collected were submitted to the laboratory for quantitative cultures and sensitivities. Results were documented on predesigned proforma.

RESULTS

Fifty four patients underwent paired B-BAL and N-BAL sampling. The N-BAL sensitivity and specificity for N-BAL were 87.87% and 85.71% respectively and p-value was <0.001. N-BAL showed sensitivity of 87.87%, specificity of 75.71%, positive predictive value of 89.65%, negative predictive value of 77.77% and p<0.001, which was statistically significant. Significant differences in time required for sample collection and cost of both procedures were also observed.

CONCLUSION

The results favour the use of blind NG tube bronchoalveolar lavage quantitative cultures as it is simple, safe, cost-effective and minimally invasive method of diagnosing VAP.

摘要

目的

比较定量支气管镜下支气管肺泡灌洗(B - BAL)培养与经鼻盲插胃管支气管肺泡灌洗(N - BAL)培养在诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)中的作用。

研究设计

横断面比较研究。

研究地点及时间

本研究于2007年1月至8月在卡拉奇利亚卡特国家医院(LNH)的内科重症监护病房和胸科重症监护病房进行。

方法

入住重症监护病房且临床怀疑患有VAP并符合纳入标准(即发热、白细胞增多、胸部X线片出现新的或加重的浸润影或脓性分泌物)的患者纳入研究。排除标准为凝血功能障碍、极高的通气和氧合需求以及气管阻塞。所有患者先使用16F鼻胃管(NG)在不润滑的情况下进行N - BAL,随后进行B - BAL。采集的样本送至实验室进行定量培养和药敏试验。结果记录在预先设计的表格上。

结果

54例患者接受了B - BAL和N - BAL配对采样。N - BAL的敏感性和特异性分别为87.87%和85.71%,p值<0.001。N - BAL的敏感性为87.87%,特异性为75.71%,阳性预测值为89.65%,阴性预测值为77.77%,p<0.001,具有统计学意义。同时还观察到两种操作在样本采集所需时间和成本方面存在显著差异。

结论

结果支持使用经鼻盲插胃管支气管肺泡灌洗定量培养,因为它是诊断VAP的一种简单、安全、经济有效且微创的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验