Xie Feng, Dodla Saritha, O'Leary Edward, Porter Thomas R
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 May;1(3):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.02.004.
The purpose of this study was to test whether the transmural delineation of myocardial perfusion during dobutamine stress imaging with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) might permit visualization of dobutamine-induced subendocardial ischemia.
Significant coronary artery disease can be present despite normal transmural wall thickening (WT) responses during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). One potential reason is dobutamine-induced recruitment of epicardial WT in the presence of subendocardial ischemia.
Myocardial perfusion and WT were examined with RTMCE during DSE with a continuous infusion of ultrasound contrast in 94 patients with normal resting WT. Fifty-five of the patients had a >50% diameter stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). The WT was visually assessed by a blinded reviewer at 2 time periods: initially after a high mechanical index impulse before myocardial contrast replenishment (MCR), and again during MCR. Subendocardial %WT was measured during MCR, if a subendocardial perfusion defect was visually evident, whereas transmural WT was quantified on the pre-MCR images.
Fifty patients (91%) with LAD stenoses exhibited a myocardial contrast defect at peak stress, with 45 defects being subendocardial. Transmural WT pre-MCR appeared normal in 35 of the 45 patients with subendocardial perfusion defects (78%). However, a subendocardial WT abnormality was apparent during MCR in 18 of these 35 patients, even though transmural WT was not different from the 17 patients with normal subendocardial WT (33 +/- 15% vs. 36 +/- 14%). Quantitative measurements of WT within the subendocardium were significantly less in the patients with visually evident subendocardial WT abnormalities, when compared with those who seemed to have normal WT during MCR (17 +/- 8% vs. 25 +/- 10%, p < 0.01).
In patients with significant LAD disease, RTMCE during DSE detects subendocardial ischemia even when transmural WT appears normal. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography should be the preferred ultrasound imaging method when using contrast to detect coronary artery disease during DSE.
本研究旨在测试在多巴酚丁胺负荷成像中使用实时心肌对比超声心动图(RTMCE)进行心肌灌注的透壁描绘是否能够显示多巴酚丁胺诱导的心内膜下缺血。
尽管在多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)期间透壁壁增厚(WT)反应正常,但仍可能存在显著的冠状动脉疾病。一个潜在原因是在存在心内膜下缺血的情况下,多巴酚丁胺诱导的心外膜WT的募集。
在94例静息WT正常的患者中,在DSE期间通过持续输注超声造影剂,用RTMCE检查心肌灌注和WT。55例患者左前降支冠状动脉(LAD)直径狭窄>50%。由一位不知情的观察者在两个时间段对WT进行视觉评估:最初在心肌对比剂补充(MCR)之前的高机械指数脉冲后,以及在MCR期间再次评估。如果心内膜下灌注缺损在视觉上明显,则在MCR期间测量心内膜下WT百分比,而透壁WT在MCR前图像上进行量化。
50例(91%)LAD狭窄患者在负荷峰值时出现心肌对比剂缺损,其中45个缺损为心内膜下缺损。在45例心内膜下灌注缺损患者中,有35例(78%)MCR前的透壁WT看起来正常。然而,在这35例患者中,有18例在MCR期间心内膜下WT异常明显,尽管透壁WT与17例心内膜下WT正常的患者没有差异(33±15%对36±14%)。与MCR期间WT似乎正常的患者相比,心内膜下WT有明显视觉异常的患者心内膜内WT的定量测量值显著更低(17±8%对25±10%,p<0.01)。
在患有显著LAD疾病的患者中,DSE期间的RTMCE即使在透壁WT看起来正常时也能检测到心内膜下缺血。在DSE期间使用造影剂检测冠状动脉疾病时,实时心肌对比超声心动图应是首选的超声成像方法。