[At home in a home? Did de-hospitalisation mean de-institutionalisation?].

OBJECTIVES

In the last decades, long-time patients were systematically discharged from psychiatric hospitals in order to integrate this disadvantaged population into the community. This procedures where adequately evaluated and are regarded to be completed in the western world today. However, few evidence has been presented regarding the further course of integration following discharge from mental hospitals: was integration into community really successful or were patients permanently placed in sheltered housing staffed 24 hours 7 days a week. This review focuses on the question whether papers describing large de-institutionalisation projects mention the level of institutional support in the years following discharge from hospital. Furthermore we tried to find out which parameters are dealt with when describing successful community integration.

METHODS

"Pubmed" was searched for studies on de-institutionalisation projects published between 1997 and 2007.

RESULTS

The discharge from the mental hospital wards was in all studies described as successful, positive effects like an increased quality of life were found. However, studies describing the years following discharge mentioned that patients continuously stayed in sheltered housing with care offered 24 hours a day.

CONCLUSION

Reviewing the available data about the level of support regarding accommodation of former long time patients, the danger of "trans-institutionalisation" has to be pointed out. Evidence is lacking concerning support models tailored to the individual needs of the patients. Similarly, possible side effects of long-term stays in sheltered housing staffed 24 hours a day have not yet been established. Therefore, we see a need for further evaluation of different models of supported housing for former long-term hospitalised patients, as well as for new chronic mentally ill patients.