Ji Sang Hoon, Lim Do Hyoung, Yi Seong Yoon, Kim Hyo Song, Jun Hyun Jung, Kim Kyoung Ha, Chang Myung Hee, Park Min Jae, Uhm Ji Eun, Lee Jeeyun, Park Se Hoon, Park Joon Oh, Park Young Suk, Lim Ho Yeong, Kang Won Ki
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea.
BMC Cancer. 2009 Apr 9;9:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-110.
Because treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients after failure with first-line chemotherapy remains controversial, we performed this retrospective analysis based on the data obtained from 1455 patients registered in a first-line treatment cohort with respect to receiving or not receiving subsequent chemotherapy.
The decision for administering second-line chemotherapy was, in most cases, at the discretion of the physician. Seven-hundred twenty-five (50%) received second-line chemotherapy after first-line failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the recognized baseline parameters for survival.
At the time of initiating second-line chemotherapy, the patients' median age was 56 years (range, 22 to 86) and 139 (19%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or more. Seven (1%) complete and 108 (15%) partial responses to second-line chemotherapy were observed for an overall response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 19%). The median progression-free and overall survivals, calculated from the start of second-line chemotherapy, were 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.3) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 7.5), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that low baseline hemoglobin level (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90) and a poor performance status (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83) were independent negative prognostic factors for overall survival.
Performance status, along with baseline hemoglobin level, could be used to identify the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from second-line chemotherapy for AGC.
由于一线化疗失败后晚期胃癌(AGC)患者的治疗仍存在争议,我们基于1455例一线治疗队列中登记的患者是否接受后续化疗的数据进行了这项回顾性分析。
在大多数情况下,二线化疗的决定由医生自行决定。725例(50%)患者一线治疗失败后接受了二线化疗。对公认的生存基线参数进行单因素和多因素分析。
开始二线化疗时,患者的中位年龄为56岁(范围22至86岁),139例(19%)东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为2或更高。观察到7例(1%)完全缓解和108例(15%)部分缓解,总缓解率为16%(95%置信区间[CI],13%至19%)。从二线化疗开始计算的中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为2.9个月(95%CI,2.6至3.3)和6.7个月(95%CI,5.8至7.5)。多因素分析显示,低基线血红蛋白水平(风险比[HR],0.74;95%CI 0.61 - 0.90)和较差的体能状态(HR,0.66;95%CI,0.52 - 0.83)是总生存的独立负性预后因素。
体能状态以及基线血红蛋白水平可用于识别最可能从AGC二线化疗中获益的患者亚组。