• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of diagnostic self-tests on body materials among Internet users in the Netherlands: prevalence and correlates of use.荷兰互联网用户对身体材料进行诊断自测的情况:使用 prevalence 及其相关因素
BMC Public Health. 2009 Apr 9;9:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-100.
2
How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey.人们如何应对自检结果?一项横断面调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 13;11:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-77.
3
Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol).改善自我检测行为(IBIS)研究:使用频率、后果、信息需求和使用情况以及当前可用消费者信息质量研究(方案)。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 3;10:453. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-453.
4
To test or not to test: a cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV.检测还是不检测:胆固醇、血糖和 HIV 自我检测的社会心理决定因素的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 17;11:112. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-112.
5
Quality and use of consumer information provided with home test kits: room for improvement.家用检测试剂盒所提供的消费者信息的质量与使用情况:仍有改进空间。
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):741-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00805.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
6
Usage of purchased self-tests for HIV infections among migrants living in the UK, France and the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.在英、法、荷居住的移民中使用购买的 HIV 感染自检工具的情况:一项横断面研究。
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Dec;95(8):629-632. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053583. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
7
The usefulness of a free self-test for screening albuminuria in the general population: a cross-sectional survey.在普通人群中使用免费的自我检测筛查白蛋白尿的效用:一项横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 9;9:381. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-381.
8
Effects of a web-based decision aid regarding diagnostic self-testing. A single-blind randomized controlled trial.基于网络的诊断自测决策辅助工具的效果。一项单盲随机对照试验。
Health Educ Res. 2016 Jun;31(3):395-404. doi: 10.1093/her/cyw014. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
9
What young Dutch adults say they do to keep from gaining weight: self-reported prevalence of overeating, compensatory behaviours and specific weight control behaviours.荷兰年轻成年人自述的防止体重增加的做法:暴饮暴食、代偿行为及特定体重控制行为的自我报告患病率。
Public Health Nutr. 2007 Aug;10(8):790-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007258537. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
10
What is the Profile of Individuals Joining the KNEEguru Online Health Community? A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study.加入膝关节专家在线健康社区的人群概况是怎样的?一项横断面混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 18;18(4):e84. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5374.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.美国老年人使用家用医疗检测的情况:一项全国代表性调查。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241284168. doi: 10.1177/00469580241284168.
2
Direct-to-consumer tests advertised online in Australia and their implications for medical overuse: systematic online review and a typology of clinical utility.直接面向消费者的测试在澳大利亚的网络广告及其对过度医疗的影响:系统的网络审查和临床效用分类。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 27;13(12):e074205. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074205.
3
Should Commercial Diagnostic Testing Be Stimulated or Discouraged? Analyzing Willingness-to-Pay and Market Externalities of Three Commercial Diagnostic Tests in The Netherlands.是否应该刺激或抑制商业诊断检测?荷兰三种商业诊断检测的支付意愿和市场外部性分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Mar;22(2):193-207. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00846-0. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Public's Willingness to Perform COVID-19 Self-Testing During the Transition to the Endemic Phase in Malaysia - A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.马来西亚向疫情地方性流行阶段过渡期间公众进行新冠病毒自我检测的意愿——一项基于人群的横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Nov 21;16:2505-2519. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S439530. eCollection 2023.
5
Towards a decision aid for self-tests: Users' experiences in The Netherlands.迈向自我检测决策辅助工具:荷兰用户的体验。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):983-992. doi: 10.1111/hex.12903. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
6
Evaluation and enumeration of online test providers for sexually transmitted infections, specifically chlamydia, in the Netherlands.荷兰性传播感染(特别是衣原体感染)在线检测供应商的评估和列举。
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Aug;95(5):380-385. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053771. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
Socio-demographic, health-related, and individual correlates of diagnostic self-testing by lay people: Results from a representative survey in Germany.社会人口学、健康相关因素和个体因素与非专业人员的诊断自测相关:来自德国代表性调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188653. eCollection 2017.
8
Usage of purchased self-tests for HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: results of population-based and serial cross-sectional studies among the general population and sexual risk groups.荷兰阿姆斯特丹购买的艾滋病毒和性传播感染自检试剂的使用情况:基于人群及一般人群和性风险群体系列横断面研究的结果
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 21;7(9):e016609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016609.
9
Psychological, situational and application-related determinants of the intention to self-test: a factorial survey among students.自我检测意愿的心理、情境及应用相关决定因素:一项针对学生的析因调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2394-x.
10
Diabetes self-management arrangements in Europe: a realist review to facilitate a project implemented in six countries.欧洲的糖尿病自我管理安排:一项现实主义综述,以推动在六个国家实施的一个项目
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 2;14:453. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-453.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-testing for cancer: a community survey.癌症自我检测:一项社区调查。
BMC Cancer. 2008 Apr 14;8:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-102.
2
[The increased availability of self-tests for medical analyses].[医学分析自测的可及性增加]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Apr 21;151(16):901-4.
3
Self-care--has DIY gone too far?自我护理——DIY(自己动手做)是否过头了?
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Dec;56(533):907-8.
4
Range of self-tests available to buy in the United Kingdom: an Internet survey.英国可购买的自测产品范围:一项网络调查。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Dec;28(4):370-4. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl051. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
5
Home testing to detect human immunodeficiency virus: boon or bane?用于检测人类免疫缺陷病毒的家庭检测:是福还是祸?
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Oct;44(10):3473-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01511-06.
6
Prevalence and determinants of the use of self-tests by members of the public: a mixed methods study.公众使用自我检测的患病率及影响因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Jul 25;6:193. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-193.
7
Direct to consumer medical tests are offered in United States.在美国提供直接面向消费者的医学检测。
BMJ. 2006 Jul 1;333(7557):12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7557.12-a.

荷兰互联网用户对身体材料进行诊断自测的情况:使用 prevalence 及其相关因素

Use of diagnostic self-tests on body materials among Internet users in the Netherlands: prevalence and correlates of use.

作者信息

Ronda Gaby, Portegijs Piet, Dinant Geert-Jan, Buntinx Frank, Norg Roelf, van der Weijden Trudy

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2009 Apr 9;9:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-100.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-9-100
PMID:19358708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2675528/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A range of self-tests on body materials has become available to the general public, but the extent of their use has hardly been studied. This study examined how many people use diagnostic self-tests on body materials such as blood or urine, as well as the type of tests that are used, and factors associated with their use.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey. Participants were recruited from an existing Dutch Internet panel of 12,529 persons, and information was collected by means of a structured Internet-based questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess correlates of self-test use.

RESULTS

Response to the survey was 63%. Sixteen percent of the respondents said they had ever used at least one self-test, with a mean of 2.1 tests per self-tester. The most frequently reported self-tests were those for diabetes and cholesterol. Self-testers generally reported lower health status and had a higher BMI than non-testers. On the other hand, they were more likely to engage in health-related behaviour such as the use of dietary supplements and homeopathic medicine.

CONCLUSION

Self-testing proved to be relatively prevalent among Dutch Internet users. We therefore think that it is essential to develop appropriate information for consumers, health care providers and policymakers, about the pros and cons of self-testing and specific self-tests. More test-specific research is needed.

摘要

背景

一系列针对身体物质的自我检测已面向公众,但对其使用程度的研究却几乎没有。本研究调查了有多少人使用针对血液或尿液等身体物质的诊断性自我检测,以及所使用检测的类型,还有与使用相关的因素。

方法

横断面调查。参与者从荷兰一个现有的12529人的互联网样本中招募,信息通过基于互联网的结构化问卷收集。采用多重逻辑回归分析来评估自我检测使用的相关因素。

结果

调查的回复率为63%。16%的受访者表示他们曾使用过至少一种自我检测,每个自我检测者平均使用2.1次检测。最常报告的自我检测是糖尿病和胆固醇检测。自我检测者普遍报告健康状况较差,且体重指数高于非自我检测者。另一方面,他们更有可能参与与健康相关的行为,如使用膳食补充剂和顺势疗法药物。

结论

自我检测在荷兰互联网用户中相对普遍。因此,我们认为有必要为消费者、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者提供有关自我检测和特定自我检测利弊的适当信息。还需要更多针对特定检测的研究。