• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅多普勒与CT血管造影在诊断急性缺血性卒中动脉阻塞方面的准确性比较。

Accuracy of transcranial Doppler compared with CT angiography in diagnosing arterial obstructions in acute ischemic strokes.

作者信息

Brunser Alejandro M, Lavados Pablo M, Hoppe Arnold, Lopez Javiera, Valenzuela Marcela, Rivas Rodrigo

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago Chile, Av Manquehue Norte 1410, Vitacura 7630000, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2037-41. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.542704. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.542704
PMID:19359640
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with acute ischemic stroke and intracranial arterial obstructions have a poor prognosis and a high probability of deteriorating at 24 hours. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of power motion mode Doppler (PMD-TCD) compared with CT angiography as standard in diagnosing intracranial arterial obstructions in patients presenting with ischemic stroke of <24 hours.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke to the emergency department underwent high-resolution brain CT angiography and PMD-TCD within a 6-hour difference.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included. PMD-TCD demonstrated 34 intracranial occlusions and CTA 33. There were 6 false-positives and 4 false-negative diagnoses with PMD-TCD. PMD-TCD had a positive likelihood ratio of 13.7, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19, sensitivity of 81.8%, and specificity of 94% for detecting an arterial occlusion in any specific artery. Results for the middle cerebral artery were: positive likelihood ratio 24.6, negative likelihood ratio 0.045, sensitivity 95.6%, and specificity 96.2%. For the anterior circulation, the results were: positive likelihood ratio 18.5, negative likelihood ratio 0, sensitivity 100%, and specificity 94.5%. For the posterior circulation, the results were: positive likelihood ratio >1000, negative likelihood ratio 0.42, sensitivity 57.1%, and specificity 100%. The post-test probability for any occluded artery when PMD-TCD was positive increased for any admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score but was especially remarkable for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores between 7 and 15 points.

CONCLUSIONS

PMD-TCD is valid compared with CT angiography for the diagnosis of arterial occlusions in patients with acute ischemic stroke, especially in middle cerebral artery obstructions.

摘要

背景与目的

急性缺血性脑卒中且伴有颅内动脉阻塞的患者预后较差,24小时内病情恶化的可能性很高。我们旨在评估与作为标准的CT血管造影相比,动力运动模式多普勒(PMD-TCD)在诊断发病时间小于24小时的缺血性脑卒中患者颅内动脉阻塞时的诊断准确性。

方法

连续收治至急诊科的急性缺血性脑卒中患者在相差6小时内接受了高分辨率脑CT血管造影和PMD-TCD检查。

结果

共纳入100例患者。PMD-TCD显示34例颅内闭塞,CT血管造影显示33例。PMD-TCD有6例假阳性和4例假阴性诊断。在检测任何特定动脉的动脉闭塞方面,PMD-TCD的阳性似然比为13.7,阴性似然比为0.19,敏感性为81.8%,特异性为94%。大脑中动脉的结果为:阳性似然比24.6,阴性似然比0.045,敏感性95.6%,特异性96.2%。前循环的结果为:阳性似然比18.5,阴性似然比0,敏感性100%,特异性94.5%。后循环的结果为:阳性似然比>1000,阴性似然比0.42,敏感性57.1%,特异性100%。当PMD-TCD为阳性时,任何入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分的患者中任何闭塞动脉的验后概率均增加,但在7至15分的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分中尤为显著。

结论

与CT血管造影相比,PMD-TCD在诊断急性缺血性脑卒中患者的动脉闭塞方面是有效的,尤其是在大脑中动脉阻塞时。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of transcranial Doppler compared with CT angiography in diagnosing arterial obstructions in acute ischemic strokes.经颅多普勒与CT血管造影在诊断急性缺血性卒中动脉阻塞方面的准确性比较。
Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2037-41. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.542704. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
2
Applications and advantages of power motion-mode Doppler in acute posterior circulation cerebral ischemia.动力运动模式多普勒在急性后循环脑缺血中的应用及优势
Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1197-204. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.499392. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
3
The diagnostic accuracy of TCD for intracranial arterial stenosis/occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the importance of time interval between detection of TCD and CTA.经颅多普勒超声(TCD)对急性缺血性脑卒中患者颅内动脉狭窄/闭塞的诊断准确性:TCD检测与CT血管造影(CTA)之间时间间隔的重要性
Neurol Res. 2013 Nov;35(9):930-6. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000230. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
4
Validation of transcranial Doppler with computed tomography angiography in acute cerebral ischemia.经颅多普勒与计算机断层血管造影术在急性脑缺血中的验证
Stroke. 2007 Apr;38(4):1245-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000259712.64772.85. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
5
Intracranial vessel localization with power motion Doppler (PMD-TCD) compared with CT angiography in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.采用功率型(能量)多普勒经颅多普勒超声(PMD-TCD)对急性缺血性脑卒中患者颅内血管定位与 CT 血管造影比较。
Int J Stroke. 2013 Aug;8(6):398-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00751.x. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
6
Derivation of transcranial Doppler criteria for rescue intra-arterial thrombolysis: multicenter experience from the Interventional Management of Stroke study.经颅多普勒用于动脉内溶栓抢救的标准推导:来自卒中介入管理研究的多中心经验
Stroke. 2005 Apr;36(4):865-8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000157646.52285.c7. Epub 2005 Feb 24.
7
Rate of arterial occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者的动脉闭塞率。
Neurol Res. 2008 Oct;30(8):835-8. doi: 10.1179/174313208X340969.
8
Derivation of power M-mode transcranial Doppler criteria for angiographic proven MCA occlusion.经血管造影证实的大脑中动脉闭塞的功率M型经颅多普勒标准的推导
J Neuroimaging. 2006 Oct;16(4):323-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00055.x.
9
Screening for intracranial stenosis with transcranial Doppler: the accuracy of mean flow velocity thresholds.经颅多普勒超声筛查颅内狭窄:平均流速阈值的准确性
J Neuroimaging. 2002 Jan;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2002.tb00083.x.
10
Clinical Scales Do Not Reliably Identify Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Large-Artery Occlusion.临床量表不能可靠地识别患有大动脉闭塞的急性缺血性中风患者。
Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1466-72. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013144. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic value of non-invasive large vessel occlusion detection methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非侵入性大血管闭塞检测方法的诊断价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 2:15910199251345631. doi: 10.1177/15910199251345631.
2
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Transcranial Color-Coded Doppler Ultrasound Technique in Stratifying Intracranial Cerebral Artery Stenoses in Cerebrovascular Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经颅彩色编码多普勒超声技术对脑血管疾病患者颅内脑动脉狭窄分层的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):1507. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051507.
3
TCD hemodynamics findings in the subacute phase of anterior circulation stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy.
机械取栓治疗的前循环卒中患者亚急性期的经颅多普勒血流动力学研究结果
Open Med (Wars). 2022 Mar 28;17(1):606-613. doi: 10.1515/med-2022-0464. eCollection 2022.
4
Transcranial Doppler sonography for detecting stenosis or occlusion of intracranial arteries in people with acute ischaemic stroke.经颅多普勒超声检查用于检测急性缺血性脑卒中患者颅内动脉的狭窄或闭塞。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 19;2(2):CD010722. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010722.pub2.
5
Toward automated classification of pathological transcranial Doppler waveform morphology via spectral clustering.通过频谱聚类实现经颅多普勒形态病理性自动分类。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0228642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228642. eCollection 2020.
6
Diagnostic value of transcranial ultrasonography for selecting subjects with large vessel occlusion: a systematic review.经颅超声检查对选择大血管闭塞患者的诊断价值:一项系统评价
Ultrasound J. 2019 Oct 22;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13089-019-0143-6.
7
Decision Criteria for Large Vessel Occlusion Using Transcranial Doppler Waveform Morphology.使用经颅多普勒波形形态学诊断大血管闭塞的决策标准
Front Neurol. 2018 Oct 17;9:847. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00847. eCollection 2018.
8
Velocity Curvature Index: a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker for Large Vessel Occlusion.速度-曲率指数:大血管闭塞的新型诊断生物标志物。
Transl Stroke Res. 2019 Oct;10(5):475-484. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0667-2. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
9
Reliability of Hand-Held Transcranial Doppler with M-mode Ultrasound in Middle Cerebral Artery Measurement.手持经颅多普勒M型超声测量大脑中动脉的可靠性
J Med Ultrasound. 2017 Apr-Jun;25(2):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmu.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
Telesonography in emergency medicine: A systematic review.急诊医学中的远程超声检查:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0194840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194840. eCollection 2018.