Comprehensive Stroke Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Int J Stroke. 2013 Aug;8(6):398-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00751.x. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
With a view to develop an operator-independent monitoring system for sonothrombolysis, we aimed to evaluate the per cent agreement of power motion transcranial Doppler vessel tracks compared with computed tomography angiography in identification of the anterior and posterior circulation vessels in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.
Consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients who underwent emergent brain computed tomography angiography and bedside power motion transcranial Doppler were studied. Depth ranges for detecting anterior and posterior circulation vessels were derived from power motion transcranial Doppler flow tracks and computed tomography angiography images of the circle of Willis. We calculated percent agreement of power motion transcranial Doppler with computed tomography angiography for the anterior and posterior circulation vessel localization using computed tomography angiography as reference.
Samples were obtained from 34 acute ischaemic stroke patients (mean age 61 ± 16 years, 62% men, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 5, interquartile range 2-8). A total of 229 Power motion Doppler computed tomography angiography vessel pairs were analysed. Power motion transcranial Doppler tracks for M1 and proximal M2 middle cerebral artery (MCA) were located at 24-68 mm (M1 MCA: 36-68 mm; M2 MCA: 24-53 mm); anterior cerebral artery (ACA): 50-78 mm; P1 posterior cerebral artery (PCA): 50-74 mm; left vertebral artery: 30-74 mm; right vertebral artery: 30-78 mm; basilar artery: 76-106 mm. The per cent agreement of power motion Doppler-transcranial Doppler for identifying proximal intracranial arteries compared to computed tomography angiography was: M1 and M2 MCA: 100% (95% confidence interval: 96-100%); M1 MCA: 98% (95% confidence interval: 86-100%); M2 MCA: 94% (95% confidence interval: 79-99%); A1 ACA: 82% (95% confidence interval: 68-91%); P1 PCA: 70% (95% confidence interval: 53-83%); left vertebral artery: 96% (95% confidence interval: 80-100%); right vertebral artery: 96% (95% confidence interval: 79-100%); basilar artery: 100% (95% confidence interval: 89-100%).
Power motion transcranial Doppler intercepts proximal vessels with good-to-excellent agreement with computed tomography angiography. Depth ranges (as opposed to average depths) can be used to target intracranial arterial segments for sonothrombolysis.
为了开发一种适用于 sonothrombolysis 的操作人员独立监测系统,我们旨在评估功率运动经颅多普勒血管轨迹与计算机断层血管造影术在识别急性缺血性脑卒中患者前循环和后循环血管方面的百分一致率。
连续入组接受紧急脑部计算机断层血管造影术和床边功率运动经颅多普勒检查的急性缺血性脑卒中患者。从前循环和后循环血管的功率运动经颅多普勒血流轨迹和 Willis 环的计算机断层血管造影图像中得出检测前循环和后循环血管的深度范围。我们使用计算机断层血管造影术作为参考,计算功率运动经颅多普勒与计算机断层血管造影术在前循环和后循环血管定位方面的百分一致率。
共纳入 34 例急性缺血性脑卒中患者(平均年龄 61±16 岁,62%为男性,中位国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分 5 分,四分位间距 2-8 分)。共分析了 229 对功率运动经颅多普勒计算机断层血管造影血管对。M1 和近端 M2 大脑中动脉(MCA)的功率运动经颅多普勒轨迹位于 24-68mm(M1 MCA:36-68mm;M2 MCA:24-53mm);大脑前动脉(ACA):50-78mm;P1 后交通动脉(PCA):50-74mm;左侧椎动脉:30-74mm;右侧椎动脉:30-78mm;基底动脉:76-106mm。与计算机断层血管造影术相比,功率运动多普勒经颅多普勒识别近端颅内动脉的百分一致率为:M1 和 M2 MCA:100%(95%置信区间:96-100%);M1 MCA:98%(95%置信区间:86-100%);M2 MCA:94%(95%置信区间:79-99%);A1 ACA:82%(95%置信区间:68-91%);P1 PCA:70%(95%置信区间:53-83%);左侧椎动脉:96%(95%置信区间:80-100%);右侧椎动脉:96%(95%置信区间:79-100%);基底动脉:100%(95%置信区间:89-100%)。
功率运动经颅多普勒可以很好地与计算机断层血管造影术一致地截获近端血管。可以使用深度范围(而非平均深度)来靶向颅内动脉段进行 sonothrombolysis。