Hospenthal Duane R, Crouch Helen K
Infections Disease Services, Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, USA.
J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4 Suppl):S120-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819cdd96.
Personnel sustaining combat-related injuries in current overseas conflicts continue to have their care complicated by infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms, including Acinetobacter, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas. Although presumed to be due to multiple factors both within and outside of the combat theater, concern has been raised about the difficulties in establishing and maintaining standard infection control (IC) practices in deployed medical treatment facilities and in the evacuation of the injured back to the United States.
Level III facilities (hospitals capable of holding patients >72 hours) in Iraq and Afghanistan and the evacuation system from Iraq to the continental US were reviewed by an expert IC-infectious disease team.
All reviewed facilities had established IC programs, but these were staffed by personnel with limited IC experience, often without perceived adequate time dedicated to perform their duties, and without uniform levels of command emphasis or support. Proper hand hygiene between patients was not always ideal. Isolation and cohorting of patients to decrease multidrug-resistant organism colonization and infection varied among facilities. Review of standard operating procedures found variability among institutions and in quality of these documents. Application of US national and theater-specific guidelines and of antimicrobial control measures also varied among facilities.
Effective IC practices are often difficult to maintain in modern US hospitals. In the deployed setting, with ever-changing personnel in a less than optimal practice environment, IC is even more challenging. Standardization of practice with emphasis on the basics of IC practice (e.g., hand hygiene and isolation procedures) needs to be emplaced and maintained in the deployed setting.
在当前海外冲突中遭受与战斗相关损伤的人员,其治疗仍因多重耐药菌(包括不动杆菌、克雷伯菌和假单胞菌)引起的感染而变得复杂。尽管推测这是由战区内外的多种因素导致的,但人们对在部署的医疗设施中建立和维持标准感染控制(IC)措施以及将伤员后送至美国本土的困难表示担忧。
一个由感染控制专家和传染病专家组成的团队对伊拉克和阿富汗的三级医疗设施(能够收治患者超过72小时的医院)以及从伊拉克到美国本土的后送系统进行了评估。
所有接受评估的设施都已建立感染控制项目,但这些项目的工作人员感染控制经验有限,通常感觉没有足够的时间履行职责,且指挥层面的重视和支持程度不一。患者之间正确的手部卫生情况并不总是理想。各设施在通过隔离和分组来减少多重耐药菌定植和感染方面存在差异。对标准操作程序的审查发现各机构之间以及这些文件的质量存在差异。美国国家指南和战区特定指南以及抗菌控制措施在各设施中的应用也存在差异。
有效的感染控制措施在现代美国医院中往往难以维持。在部署环境中,人员不断变化且实践环境不理想,感染控制更具挑战性。需要在部署环境中确立并维持以感染控制实践基础(如手部卫生和隔离程序)为重点的实践标准化。