Suppr超能文献

应用新型图像评分方法对常规孕中期心脏图像进行审核的影响。

Impact of audit of routine second-trimester cardiac images using a novel image-scoring method.

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;33(5):545-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.6323.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of using an objective scoring method to audit cardiac images obtained as part of the routine 21-23-week anomaly scan.

METHODS

A prospective audit and re-audit (6 months later) were conducted on cardiac images obtained by sonographers during the routine anomaly scan. A new image-scoring method was devised based on expected features in the four-chamber and outflow tract views. For each patient, scores were awarded for documentation and quality of individual views. These were called 'Documentation Scores' and 'View Scores' and were added to give a 'Patient Score' which represented the quality of screening provided by the sonographer for that particular patient (maximum score, 15). In order to assess the overall performance of sonographers, an 'Audit Score' was calculated for each by averaging his or her Patient Scores. In addition, to assess each sonographer's performance in relation to particular aspects of the various views, each was given their own 'Sonographer View Scores', derived from image documentation and details of four-chamber view (magnification, valve offset and septum) and left and right outflow tract views. All images were scored by two reviewers, jointly in the primary audit and independently in the re-audit. The scores from primary and re-audit were compared to assess the impact of feedback from the primary audit.

RESULTS

Eight sonographers participated in the study. The median Audit Score increased significantly (P < 0.01), from 10.8 (range, 9.8-12.4) in the primary audit to 12.4 (range, 10.4-13.6) in the re-audit. Scores allocated by the two reviewers in the re-audit were not significantly different (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Objective scoring of fetal heart images is feasible and has a positive impact on the quality of cardiac images acquired at the time of the routine anomaly scan. This audit tool has the potential to be applied in every obstetric scanning unit and may improve the effectiveness of screening for congenital heart defects.

摘要

目的

评估使用客观评分方法审核作为常规 21-23 周异常扫描一部分获得的心脏图像的效果。

方法

对超声医师在常规异常扫描期间获得的心脏图像进行前瞻性审核和再审核(6 个月后)。根据四腔心和流出道视图中预期的特征,设计了一种新的图像评分方法。为每个患者的单个视图的记录和质量授予分数。这些分数分别称为“记录分数”和“视图分数”,并将其相加得到代表该特定患者筛查质量的“患者分数”(最高分数为 15)。为了评估超声医师的整体表现,为每位超声医师计算平均患者分数的“审核分数”。此外,为了评估每位超声医师在各种视图的特定方面的表现,从图像记录和四腔心视图(放大倍数、瓣膜偏移和间隔)以及左、右流出道视图的详细信息中为每位超声医师获得他们自己的“超声医师视图分数”。所有图像均由两位审阅者进行评分,在初步审核中联合评分,在重新审核中独立评分。将初步和重新审核的分数进行比较,以评估来自初步审核的反馈的影响。

结果

八名超声医师参与了研究。审核分数中位数明显增加(P < 0.01),从初步审核的 10.8(范围,9.8-12.4)增加到重新审核的 12.4(范围,10.4-13.6)。重新审核中两位审阅者分配的分数没有明显差异(P = 0.08)。

结论

胎儿心脏图像的客观评分是可行的,并且对常规异常扫描时获得的心脏图像质量有积极影响。这种审核工具有可能适用于每个产科扫描单位,并可能提高先天性心脏病筛查的效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验