Suppr超能文献

开放和腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的肿瘤学结果比较:1249 例多机构分析。

Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1249 cases.

机构信息

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2009 Jul;56(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.072. Epub 2009 Apr 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) compared to open nephroureterectomy (ONU) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We compared recurrence and cause-specific mortality rates of ONU and LNU.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen centers from three continents contributed data on 1249 patients with nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

MEASUREMENTS

Univariable and multivariable survival models tested the effect of procedure type (ONU [n=979] vs LNU [n=270]) on cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Covariables consisted of institution, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score, pT stage, pN stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, tumor location, concomitant carcinoma in situ, ureteral cuff management, previous urothelial bladder cancer, and previous endoscopic treatment.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median follow-up for censored cases was 49 mo (mean: 62). Relative to ONU, LNU patients had more favorable pathologic stages (pT0/Ta/Tis: 38.1% vs 20.8%, p<0.001) and less lymphovascular invasion (14.8% vs 21.3%, p=0.02) and less frequently had tumors located in the ureter (64.5 vs 71.1%, p=0.04). In univariable recurrence and cancer-specific mortality models, ONU was associated with higher cancer recurrence and mortality rates compared to LNU (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.1 [p<0.001] and 2.0 [p=0.008], respectively). After adjustment for all covariates, ONU and LNU had no residual effect on cancer recurrence and mortality (p=0.1 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term oncologic data on LNU are comparable to ONU. Since LNU was selectively performed in favorable-risk patients, we cannot state with certainty that ONU and LNU have the same oncologic efficacy in poor-risk patients. Long-term follow-up data and morbidity data are necessary before LNU can be considered as the standard of care in patients with muscle-invasive or high-grade UTUC.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术(LNU)与开放肾输尿管切除术(ONU)相比的肿瘤学疗效数据稀缺。

目的

我们比较了 ONU 和 LNU 的复发和特定原因死亡率。

设计、设置和参与者:来自三大洲的 13 个中心提供了 1249 例非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的数据。

测量

单变量和多变量生存模型测试了手术类型(ONU [n=979] 与 LNU [n=270])对上尿路尿路上皮癌复发和癌症特异性死亡率的影响。协变量包括机构、年龄、东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)表现状态评分、pT 分期、pN 分期、肿瘤分级、淋巴血管侵犯、肿瘤位置、同时原位癌、输尿管袖口管理、先前的尿路上皮膀胱癌和先前的内镜治疗。

结果和局限性

对删失病例进行中位随访 49 个月(平均:62 个月)。与 ONU 相比,LNU 患者的病理分期更有利(pT0/Ta/Tis:38.1% 比 20.8%,p<0.001),淋巴血管侵犯较少(14.8% 比 21.3%,p=0.02),且肿瘤位于输尿管的频率较低(64.5% 比 71.1%,p=0.04)。在单变量复发和癌症特异性死亡率模型中,ONU 与 LNU 相比,癌症复发和死亡率更高(风险比[HR]:2.1 [p<0.001] 和 2.0 [p=0.008])。在调整所有协变量后,ONU 和 LNU 对癌症复发和死亡率没有残留影响(p=0.1 均)。

结论

LNU 的短期肿瘤学数据与 ONU 相当。由于 LNU 仅选择性地用于低危患者,因此我们不能确定在高危患者中,ONU 和 LNU 的肿瘤学疗效相同。在 LNU 可以被认为是肌层浸润性或高级别 UTUC 患者的标准治疗方法之前,需要进行长期随访数据和发病率数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验