Suppr超能文献

浸润性小叶癌新辅助化疗后的切缘评估。

Margin assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular cancer.

作者信息

Wagner Jamie, Boughey Judy C, Garrett Betsy, Babiera Gildy, Kuerer Henry, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Singletary Eva, Hunt Kelly K, Middleton Lavinia P, Bedrosian Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2009 Sep;198(3):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical management of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unknown. We evaluated optimal margin distance and local recurrence (LR) rates for these patients.

METHODS

Ninety-three (30%) of 311 patients with ILC received NAC. We examined margin status, residual disease after re-excision, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Margin positivity rates after the final operative procedure were similar between the NAC and surgery-first group (P > .05). The proportion of patients, stratified by margin status, who were taken back for re-excision was not different between the 2 groups, and, similarly, there were no differences in frequency of residual disease (all P > .05). At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 1 patient in the NAC group and 2 in the surgery-first group developed LR (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ILC who have undergone NAC and have margins >1 mm have a low probability of residual disease and LR.

摘要

背景

接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的浸润性小叶癌(ILC)患者的最佳手术管理尚不清楚。我们评估了这些患者的最佳切缘距离和局部复发(LR)率。

方法

311例ILC患者中有93例(30%)接受了NAC。我们检查了切缘状态、再次切除后的残留疾病以及临床结局。

结果

NAC组和先手术组在最终手术操作后的切缘阳性率相似(P>.05)。按切缘状态分层后,两组中因切缘问题返回进行再次切除的患者比例没有差异,同样,残留疾病的发生率也没有差异(所有P>.05)。中位随访3.1年时,NAC组有1例患者发生LR,先手术组有2例(P = 1.0)。

结论

接受NAC且切缘>1 mm的ILC患者残留疾病和LR的概率较低。

相似文献

1
Margin assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular cancer.
Am J Surg. 2009 Sep;198(3):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
2
Breast surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with lobular carcinoma: surgical and oncologic outcome.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Apr;204(3):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07192-8. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
Evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical outcomes after breast conserving surgery.
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;123(2):439-445. doi: 10.1002/jso.26301. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy by subtype approximation and surgical margin.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jan;149(2):555-64. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3273-y. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
6
Do Calcifications Seen on Mammography After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Always Need to Be Excised?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1492-1498. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5741-y. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
9
Pathologic tumor response of invasive lobular carcinoma to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Breast J. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):569-74. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12006. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
10
Differences in Response and Surgical Management with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):51-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4603-3. Epub 2015 May 16.

引用本文的文献

2
A nomogram for determining the disease-specific survival in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A population study.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22807. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022807.
3
Success rates of re-excision after positive margins for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019 Sep 6;5:29. doi: 10.1038/s41523-019-0125-7. eCollection 2019.
4
Surgical Management of Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Breast Care (Basel). 2018 Aug;13(4):238-243. doi: 10.1159/000491760. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
5
Clinical benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oestrogen receptor-positive invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas.
Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):285-91. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.557. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular carcinoma may not improve rates of breast conservation.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1606-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0402-z. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Presence of lobular carcinoma in situ does not increase local recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Aug;15(8):2263-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9960-8. Epub 2008 May 28.
2
Margin status and the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment of lobular breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Sep;105(1):63-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9431-5. Epub 2006 Nov 18.
5
6
Treatment trends in early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.
Ann Surg. 2005 Aug;242(2):281-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000171306.74366.22.
7
Invasive lobular carcinoma classic type: response to primary chemotherapy and survival outcomes.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 1;23(1):41-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.111.
9
Surgical treatment for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Breast. 2003 Feb;12(1):23-35. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9776(02)00182-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验