Suppr超能文献

浸润性小叶癌的新辅助化疗可能无法提高保乳率。

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular carcinoma may not improve rates of breast conservation.

作者信息

Boughey Judy C, Wagner Jamie, Garrett Betsy J, Harker Lori, Middleton Lavinia P, Babiera Gildy V, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Lucci Anthony, Hunt Kelly K, Bedrosian Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1606-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0402-z. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) experience a lower pathological complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. This study was intended to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ILC on breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates.

METHODS

Two-hundred eighty-four consecutive patients with pure ILC treated between May 1998 and September 2006 were reviewed. Surgical procedures and long-term outcomes were compared between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those receiving surgery first.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 84 patients; 200 patients underwent surgery first. The mean tumor size in the neoadjuvant group (4.9 cm) was significantly larger than in patients who underwent surgery first (2.5 cm, p < 0.0001). In the neoadjuvant group, clinical complete response was seen in 10% and partial response in 59%. Overall BCS rates were 17% in the neoadjuvant group compared with 43% in the surgery-first group (p < 0.0001). When controlled for initial tumor size, there was no difference (all p > 0.05) between the groups in terms of (1) the proportion of patients who underwent an initial attempt at BCS, (2) rate of failure of BCS or (3) the proportion of patients undergoing BCS as their final procedure. With a mean follow-up of 47 months, local recurrence (LR) rates were similar between the two groups (1.2% versus 0.5%, p = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase the rates of breast conservation in patients with pure ILC.

摘要

背景

与浸润性导管癌患者相比,浸润性小叶癌(ILC)患者对新辅助化疗的病理完全缓解率较低。本研究旨在评估ILC患者新辅助化疗对保乳手术(BCS)率的影响。

方法

回顾了1998年5月至2006年9月期间连续治疗的284例纯ILC患者。比较接受新辅助化疗的患者和先接受手术的患者的手术方式及长期预后。

结果

84例患者接受了新辅助化疗;200例患者先接受了手术。新辅助化疗组的平均肿瘤大小(4.9 cm)显著大于先接受手术的患者(2.5 cm,p<0.0001)。在新辅助化疗组中,临床完全缓解率为10%,部分缓解率为59%。新辅助化疗组的总体BCS率为17%,而先手术组为43%(p<0.0001)。在控制初始肿瘤大小后,两组在以下方面无差异(所有p>0.05):(1)初次尝试BCS的患者比例;(2)BCS失败率;(3)最终接受BCS的患者比例。平均随访47个月,两组的局部复发(LR)率相似(1.2%对0.5%,p = 0.5)。

结论

新辅助化疗的应用并未提高纯ILC患者的保乳率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Lobular Breast Cancer: A Review.小叶性乳腺癌综述
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 15;10:591399. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.591399. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Margin assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular cancer.浸润性小叶癌新辅助化疗后的切缘评估。
Am J Surg. 2009 Sep;198(3):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
6
Lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular cancer of the breast.乳腺小叶原位癌和浸润性小叶癌。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;17(1):55-60. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200502000-00010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验