Boughey Judy C, Wagner Jamie, Garrett Betsy J, Harker Lori, Middleton Lavinia P, Babiera Gildy V, Meric-Bernstam Funda, Lucci Anthony, Hunt Kelly K, Bedrosian Isabelle
Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1606-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0402-z. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) experience a lower pathological complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. This study was intended to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ILC on breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates.
Two-hundred eighty-four consecutive patients with pure ILC treated between May 1998 and September 2006 were reviewed. Surgical procedures and long-term outcomes were compared between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those receiving surgery first.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 84 patients; 200 patients underwent surgery first. The mean tumor size in the neoadjuvant group (4.9 cm) was significantly larger than in patients who underwent surgery first (2.5 cm, p < 0.0001). In the neoadjuvant group, clinical complete response was seen in 10% and partial response in 59%. Overall BCS rates were 17% in the neoadjuvant group compared with 43% in the surgery-first group (p < 0.0001). When controlled for initial tumor size, there was no difference (all p > 0.05) between the groups in terms of (1) the proportion of patients who underwent an initial attempt at BCS, (2) rate of failure of BCS or (3) the proportion of patients undergoing BCS as their final procedure. With a mean follow-up of 47 months, local recurrence (LR) rates were similar between the two groups (1.2% versus 0.5%, p = 0.5).
The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase the rates of breast conservation in patients with pure ILC.
与浸润性导管癌患者相比,浸润性小叶癌(ILC)患者对新辅助化疗的病理完全缓解率较低。本研究旨在评估ILC患者新辅助化疗对保乳手术(BCS)率的影响。
回顾了1998年5月至2006年9月期间连续治疗的284例纯ILC患者。比较接受新辅助化疗的患者和先接受手术的患者的手术方式及长期预后。
84例患者接受了新辅助化疗;200例患者先接受了手术。新辅助化疗组的平均肿瘤大小(4.9 cm)显著大于先接受手术的患者(2.5 cm,p<0.0001)。在新辅助化疗组中,临床完全缓解率为10%,部分缓解率为59%。新辅助化疗组的总体BCS率为17%,而先手术组为43%(p<0.0001)。在控制初始肿瘤大小后,两组在以下方面无差异(所有p>0.05):(1)初次尝试BCS的患者比例;(2)BCS失败率;(3)最终接受BCS的患者比例。平均随访47个月,两组的局部复发(LR)率相似(1.2%对0.5%,p = 0.5)。
新辅助化疗的应用并未提高纯ILC患者的保乳率。