Department of Radiology, Hyogo Kaibara Hospital, 5208-1 Kaibara, Kaibara-cho, Tanba 669-3395, Japan.
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jun;74(3):500-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of reconstruction algorithm on identification and image quality of ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and partly solid nodules on low-dose thin-section CT.
A chest CT phantom including simulated GGOs and partly solid nodules was scanned with five different tube currents and reconstructed by using standard (A) and newly developed (B) high-resolution reconstruction algorithms, followed by visually assessment of identification and image quality of GGOs and partly solid nodules by two chest radiologists. Inter-observer agreement, ROC analysis and ANOVA were performed to compare identification and image quality of each data set with those of the standard reference. The standard reference used 120 mA s in conjunction with reconstruction algorithm A.
Kappa values (kappa) of overall identification and image qualities were substantial or almost perfect (0.60<kappa). Assessment of identification showed that area under the curve of 25 mA reconstructed with reconstruction algorithm A was significantly lower than that of standard reference (p<0.05), while assessment of image quality indicated that 50 mA s reconstructed with reconstruction algorithm A and 25 mA s reconstructed with both reconstruction algorithms were significantly lower than standard reference (p<0.05).
Reconstruction algorithm may be an important factor for identification and image quality of ground-glass opacities and partly solid nodules on low-dose CT examination.
本研究旨在评估重建算法对低剂量薄层 CT 上磨玻璃密度(GGO)和部分实性结节的识别和图像质量的影响。
使用五个体管电流对包含模拟 GGO 和部分实性结节的胸部 CT 体模进行扫描,并使用标准(A)和新开发的(B)高分辨率重建算法进行重建,然后由两位胸部放射科医生对 GGO 和部分实性结节的识别和图像质量进行视觉评估。采用观察者间一致性、ROC 分析和方差分析来比较各数据集的识别和图像质量与标准参考值的差异。标准参考值采用 120 mA s 结合重建算法 A。
总体识别和图像质量的 Kappa 值(kappa)为高度一致或几乎完美(0.60<kappa)。识别评估显示,重建算法 A 重建的 25 mA 时的曲线下面积显著低于标准参考值(p<0.05),而图像质量评估则表明,重建算法 A 重建的 50 mA s 和两种重建算法重建的 25 mA s 均显著低于标准参考值(p<0.05)。
重建算法可能是低剂量 CT 检查中 GGO 和部分实性结节的识别和图像质量的一个重要因素。