Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍的补充和替代医学使用者获得传统心理健康和医疗服务的情况。

Access to conventional mental health and medical care among users of complementary and alternative medicine with bipolar disorder.

作者信息

Perron Brian E, Jarman Christopher N, Kilbourne Amy M

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Apr;197(4):287-90. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31819dc16a.

Abstract

This research examined the role of perceived barriers to treatment as a potential contributor to the increasing use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among mentally ill populations. The study examined a sample of 435 patients receiving care through the Veterans Administration Health System and having a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder (I, II, NOS), cyclothymia, or schizoaffective disorder-bipolar subtype. Access to care and use of any of 14 CAM therapies within the past year were studied. Physical CAM users reported slightly better mental health service access related to getting to mental health services and obtaining emergency mental health services when needed. Effect sizes for these differences were small (r(pb) = 0.09 and 0.13, respectively). Similarly, oral and cognitive CAM users indicated that they were slightly more likely to go without medical services when needed because they were too expensive. These effect sizes were also very small (r(pb) = 0.12 and 0.10, respectively), suggesting no clinical significance. Patients who reported use of oral and/or cognitive CAM therapies were slightly more likely than nonusers to go without medical care because of excessive costs. Patients having non-Veterans Affairs insurance reported no differences in rates of CAM use. Overall, no discernable trends were observed to suggest that CAM use among this sample was associated with service access.

摘要

本研究探讨了感知到的治疗障碍作为精神病患者中补充和替代医学(CAM)使用增加的潜在促成因素所起的作用。该研究对通过退伍军人管理局医疗系统接受治疗且目前诊断为双相情感障碍(I型、II型、未特定型)、环性心境障碍或分裂情感性障碍-双相亚型的435名患者进行了抽样调查。研究了过去一年中获得医疗服务的情况以及14种补充和替代医学疗法中任何一种的使用情况。使用身体类补充和替代医学的患者报告称,在前往心理健康服务机构以及在需要时获得紧急心理健康服务方面,他们获得心理健康服务的情况略好一些。这些差异的效应量较小(分别为r(pb)=0.09和0.13)。同样,使用口服和认知类补充和替代医学的患者表示,由于费用过高,他们在需要时更有可能不接受医疗服务。这些效应量也非常小(分别为r(pb)=0.12和0.10),表明无临床意义。报告使用口服和/或认知类补充和替代医学疗法的患者因费用过高而不接受医疗护理的可能性略高于未使用者。拥有非退伍军人事务保险的患者在补充和替代医学的使用比例上没有差异。总体而言,未观察到明显趋势表明该样本中补充和替代医学的使用与获得医疗服务有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验