Spero Moshe Halevi, Cohen Mariam
Weinstock Oncology Day Hospital, Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Department of Psychiatry, Sarah Herzog Memorial Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2009 Spring;37(1):1-19. doi: 10.1521/jaap.2009.37.1.1.
An introduction is presented to a symposium discussing the way in which the representation of the image of God can affect the analytic dialogue and process, focusing on the beliefs and images of the analyst as well as the analysand. If, as theorized, an image or a concept identified as "God" is an ineluctable element of the development of the human mind (whatever else this image may or may not mean theologically), then it would seem that the dynamic roots and potential of this kind of representation would find some expression in the countertransference dimension of analytic work. Contributors to the symposium were asked to offer detailed clinical material, paying special attention to their countertransference experiences in order to focus on the impact of religious imagery on their own "religiously oriented" internal experiences. Three questions were posed in order to conceptualize the clinical transaction in ways that could elucidate our research interests. It was not assumed that the symposium authors, or analysts in general, are formally religious, nor was this necessary to the task. The majority of the 14 authors identified themselves as currently religious; 4 were circumspect to one degree or another. Interestingly, the intensity of countertransference involvement on the level of personal religious experience varied throughout the group.
本文介绍了一场研讨会，该研讨会探讨了上帝形象的呈现方式如何影响精神分析对话及过程，重点关注分析师和受分析者的信仰与形象。如果如理论所述，被认定为“上帝”的形象或概念是人类思维发展中不可避免的元素（无论这个形象在神学上可能意味着或不意味着其他什么），那么这种呈现方式的动态根源和潜力似乎会在精神分析工作的反移情维度中有所体现。研讨会的参与者被要求提供详细的临床资料，特别关注他们的反移情体验，以便聚焦宗教意象对他们自身“宗教导向”的内在体验的影响。为了以能够阐明我们研究兴趣的方式对临床交流进行概念化，提出了三个问题。并未假定研讨会的作者或一般分析师是正式的宗教信徒，完成这项任务也不需要这样。14位作者中，大多数表明自己目前是宗教信徒；4位在某种程度上持谨慎态度。有趣的是，在个人宗教体验层面，反移情卷入的强度在整个群体中各不相同。
