Kottner Jan, Dassen Theo, Heinze Cornelia
Institut für Medizin-, Pflegepädagogik und Pflegewissenschaft der Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Pflege Z. 2009 Apr;62(4):225-30.
Accurate and precise diagnosis and classification of pressure ulcers is important in clinical practice and research. In the planning phase of a cohort study 14 data collectors were trained according to the classification of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP). Interrater reliability and agreement was measured using 20 images of the pressure ulcer classification CD (PUCLAS). Across all categories values varied between 0.36 (95 percent CI 0.32 to 0.40) and 0.54 (95 percent CI 0.49 to 0.58). Highest values of interrater reliability and agreement were measured for the categories "Pressure ulcer grade 4", "Pressure ulcer grade 2", and "Blanchable erythema". Low values were measured for the categories "Other lesion" and "Incontinence lesion". Interpretation and transferability of these results into practice is limited due to low prevalence of some categories, artificial assessment conditions and due to small sample sizes. More efforts must be made to further improve interrater reliability and agreement.
在临床实践和研究中,准确且精确地诊断和分类压疮非常重要。在一项队列研究的规划阶段,根据欧洲压疮咨询小组(EPUAP)的分类标准对14名数据收集者进行了培训。使用20张压疮分类光盘(PUCLAS)中的图像来测量评分者间的可靠性和一致性。在所有类别中,数值在0.36(95%置信区间0.32至0.40)和0.54(95%置信区间0.49至0.58)之间变化。“4期压疮”“2期压疮”和“可褪色红斑”类别的评分者间可靠性和一致性最高。“其他病变”和“失禁相关病变”类别的数值较低。由于某些类别的患病率较低、评估条件人为以及样本量较小,这些结果在实践中的解释和可转移性受到限制。必须做出更多努力以进一步提高评分者间的可靠性和一致性。