Gheith Osama A, Bakr Mohamed A, Fouda Mohamed A, Shokeir Ahmed A, Bayoumy Ahmed, Sobh Mohamed, Ghoneim Mohamed
Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egypt.
Iran J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jan;2(1):34-9.
Achievements in short-term graft survival since the introduction of cyclosporine has not been matched by improvement in long-term graft function, and chronic allograft nephropathy remains the second commonest cause of graft attrition over time. We aimed to evaluate the long-term results of conventional immunosuppression by steroid and azathioprine in comparison with cyclosporine-based triple therapy in living donor kidney transplants.
We evaluated the long-term follow-up data of 369 living related kidney transplant recipients that were on prednisolone-azathioprine immunosuppressive therapy (group 1) or triple therapy by prednisolone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine (group 2). All recipients were followed-up for more than 10 years (mean, 240 +/- 12 months). Comparative analyses included patient and graft survival rates, condition at last follow-up, graft rejection, and graft function.
There were 130 patients in group 1 and 239 in group 2. The overall frequency of acute rejection episodes was not significantly different between the two groups. However, the proportion of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy was significantly higher in group 2 (21% versus 35%, P = .001). Graft survival rates were 85.3% versus 92.4% at 1 year, 69.9% versus 71.9% at 5 years, and 52.5% versus 50.8% at 10 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .03). The two groups were comparable regarding posttransplant malignancies, diabetes mellitus, serious bacterial infections, and hepatic diseases. However, hypertensive patients were significantly more frequent in group 2.
Chronic allograft nephropathy was significantly higher in patients receiving cyclosporine, possibly due to the risk of drug-induced nephrotoxicity, glomerular disease recurrence, and hypertension. Nowadays, it is possible to achieve excellent calcineurin inhibitors-free regimen using newer maintenance immunosuppressive agents.
自环孢素应用以来,短期移植肾存活方面取得的成就并未带来长期移植肾功能的改善,随着时间推移,慢性移植肾肾病仍是移植肾失功的第二大常见原因。我们旨在评估在活体供肾移植中,与基于环孢素的三联疗法相比,使用类固醇和硫唑嘌呤进行传统免疫抑制的长期效果。
我们评估了369例接受泼尼松龙 - 硫唑嘌呤免疫抑制治疗(第1组)或泼尼松龙、环孢素和硫唑嘌呤三联疗法(第2组)的活体亲属肾移植受者的长期随访数据。所有受者均随访超过10年(平均240±12个月)。比较分析包括患者和移植肾存活率、末次随访时的状况、移植肾排斥反应和移植肾功能。
第1组有130例患者,第2组有239例患者。两组急性排斥反应发作的总体频率无显著差异。然而,第2组慢性移植肾肾病患者的比例显著更高(21%对35%,P = 0.001)。第1组和第2组在1年时移植肾存活率分别为85.3%对92.4%,5年时为69.9%对71.9%,10年时为52.5%对50.8%(P = 0.03)。两组在移植后恶性肿瘤、糖尿病、严重细菌感染和肝脏疾病方面具有可比性。然而,第2组高血压患者明显更多。
接受环孢素治疗的患者慢性移植肾肾病发生率显著更高,可能是由于药物性肾毒性、肾小球疾病复发和高血压风险。如今,使用更新的维持免疫抑制剂有可能实现无钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的优秀方案。