Palese Alvisa, De Silvestre Daniele, Valoppi Graziella, Tomietto Marco
University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2009 Apr-Jun;20(2):64-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2009.01117.x.
The aim of this 10-year retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of teaching nursing process to students at different levels of baccalaureate education, using the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International (NANDA-I) Taxonomy.
Nursing care plans written between 1996 and 2006 by 3,784 students who had completed a baccalaureate course in nursing process at a university in northern Italy were evaluated. At least three of the four steps of the nursing process were included in the evaluation: assessing, planning, intervening, and evaluating.
An average of 6.3 (range 0-31; +/-3.9; median 6) problems were identified in each care plan. Of these, 5.1 (range 0-29; +/-3.06; median 5) were related to nursing diagnoses concerning either an actual problem or the risk of developing a problem; the remaining 1.2 (range 0-20; +/-1.9; median 0) diagnoses were concerned either with collaborative problems or with potential complications. The students demonstrated significant improvement in accurately identifying 75 diagnostic titles from the NANDA-I Taxonomy as they progressed through their first, second, and third years of baccalaureate study.
These findings suggest that the ability to use the NANDA-I Taxonomy accurately is acquired over time. Thus, the theory and practice of using nursing process should be introduced in a formal course during the first year of baccalaureate nursing education and should be reinforced throughout the remaining courses. Students can then progressively improve their knowledge, critical thinking abilities, and use of the NANDA-I Taxonomy during their second and third years of study. Teaching strategies to reinforce students' learning are recommended.
这项为期10年的回顾性研究旨在评估使用北美护理诊断协会国际版(NANDA-I)分类法向不同层次本科护理教育阶段的学生教授护理程序的影响。
对1996年至2006年间在意大利北部一所大学完成护理程序本科课程的3784名学生所撰写的护理计划进行评估。护理程序的四个步骤中至少有三个被纳入评估:评估、计划、干预和评价。
每份护理计划平均确定6.3个(范围0 - 31;±3.9;中位数6)问题。其中,5.1个(范围0 - 29;±3.06;中位数5)与涉及实际问题或出现问题风险的护理诊断相关;其余1.2个(范围0 - 20;±1.9;中位数0)诊断涉及合作性问题或潜在并发症。随着本科学习的第一年、第二年和第三年的推进,学生在准确识别NANDA-I分类法中的75个诊断标题方面有显著进步。
这些发现表明准确使用NANDA-I分类法的能力是随着时间逐渐获得的。因此,应在本科护理教育的第一年通过一门正式课程引入护理程序的理论和实践,并在其余课程中不断强化。这样,学生在学习的第二年和第三年可以逐步提高他们的知识、批判性思维能力以及对NANDA-I分类法的运用。建议采用强化学生学习的教学策略。