• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

棉酚对小鼠肝脏乙醇脱氢酶和乙醛脱氢酶动力学的影响。

Effect of gossypol on kinetics of mouse liver alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase.

作者信息

Messiha F S

机构信息

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Lubbock 79430.

出版信息

Gen Pharmacol. 1991;22(4):573-6. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(91)90058-e.

DOI:10.1016/0306-3623(91)90058-e
PMID:1936890
Abstract
  1. Gossypol, an antifertility ingredient of the cotton plant, altered specific activity of mouse liver alcohol dehydrogenase (L-ADH) and subcellular aldehyde dehydrogenase (L-ALDH) in mice of both sexes. 2. Intraperitoneal injection of a single gossypol dose, 50 mg/kg, inhibited both male and female L-ADH and cytoplasmic L-ALDH from saline controls 21 hr after drug treatment. 3. Gossypol inhibited female but not male mouse mitochondrial L-ALDH isoenzymes. 4. Gossypol-produced enzyme inhibition was determined as noncompetitive. 5. The results suggest gender-dependent sensitivity of mitochondrial L-ALDH to the gossypol inhibition. A toxic metabolic interaction between ethanol and gossypol has been indicated which suggests the contraindication of alcoholic beverages during gossypol use.
摘要
  1. 棉酚是棉花植株中的一种抗生育成分,它改变了雌雄小鼠肝脏乙醇脱氢酶(L-ADH)的比活性以及亚细胞醛脱氢酶(L-ALDH)的比活性。2. 腹腔注射50mg/kg的单剂量棉酚,在药物处理21小时后,抑制了雄性和雌性小鼠的L-ADH以及来自生理盐水对照组的细胞质L-ALDH。3. 棉酚抑制雌性小鼠线粒体L-ALDH同工酶,但不抑制雄性小鼠的。4. 棉酚引起的酶抑制作用被确定为非竞争性的。5. 结果表明线粒体L-ALDH对棉酚抑制存在性别依赖性敏感性。已表明乙醇与棉酚之间存在毒性代谢相互作用,这提示在使用棉酚期间应禁用酒精饮料。

相似文献

1
Effect of gossypol on kinetics of mouse liver alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase.棉酚对小鼠肝脏乙醇脱氢酶和乙醛脱氢酶动力学的影响。
Gen Pharmacol. 1991;22(4):573-6. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(91)90058-e.
2
Behavioral and metabolic interaction between gossypol and ethanol.棉酚与乙醇之间的行为和代谢相互作用。
Toxicol Lett. 1991 Jul;57(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(91)90144-u.
3
Gossypol modulation of mouse heart and liver lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes as a function of gender.
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1990 Aug;69(2):237-40.
4
Inhibition of human alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases by acetaminophen: Assessment of the effects on first-pass metabolism of ethanol.对乙酰氨基酚对人醇脱氢酶和醛脱氢酶的抑制作用:对乙醇首过代谢影响的评估。
Alcohol. 2013 Nov;47(7):559-65. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
5
Liver alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase: inhibition and potentiation by histamine agonists and antagonists.肝脏乙醇脱氢酶和乙醛脱氢酶:组胺激动剂和拮抗剂的抑制与增强作用
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1979 May-Jun;6(3):281-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1979.tb01250.x.
6
Benzyl alcohol adverse effects in the rat: implications for toxicity as a preservative in parentral injectable solutions.大鼠体内苯甲醇的不良反应:作为肠胃外注射溶液防腐剂的毒性影响。
Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991;99(3):445-9. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(91)90269-y.
7
Effect of separate and combined treatment with chlorpromazine and lithium on mouse liver alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase.氯丙嗪和锂单独及联合治疗对小鼠肝脏乙醇脱氢酶和乙醛脱氢酶的影响。
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1984;26 Suppl 2:38-40.
8
Differences in kinetic characteristics and in sensitivity to inhibitors between human and rat liver alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase.
Gen Pharmacol. 1990;21(5):697-702. doi: 10.1016/0306-3623(90)91020-r.
9
Cholinergic, anticholinergic agents and ethanol interaction.
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1990 Apr;32(2):120-4.
10
Species variations in cutaneous alcohol dehydrogenases and aldehyde dehydrogenases may impact on toxicological assessments of alcohols and aldehydes.皮肤中的乙醇脱氢酶和乙醛脱氢酶的物种差异可能会影响对醇类和醛类的毒理学评估。
Toxicology. 2003 Mar 3;184(2-3):97-112. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00552-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Gossypol Suppresses Growth of Temozolomide-Resistant Glioblastoma Tumor Spheres.棉酚抑制替莫唑胺耐药脑胶质瘤肿瘤球的生长。
Biomolecules. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):595. doi: 10.3390/biom9100595.