Twine Christopher P, Coulston James, Shandall Ahmed, McLain Alexander D
General and Vascular Surgery, Royal Gwent Hospital, Cardiff Road, Newport, UK, NP20 2UB.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD006767. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006767.pub2.
Lower limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common, important manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis. Stenoses or occlusions in the superficial femoral artery may result in intermittent claudication as an early consequence, which may be treated by balloon angioplasty with or without stenting.
The objective was to determine the effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) when compared with PTA with stenting for lesions of the superficial femoral artery, for people with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia.
The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases (PVD) Group searched their trials register (last searched February 2009) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2009, Issue 1) for publications describing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of percutaneous angioplasty with or without stenting.
Randomised trials of angioplasty alone versus angioplasty with stenting for the treatment of superficial femoral artery stenoses.
Two authors (CT, JC) independently selected suitable trials,assessed trial quality and extracted data. A third author (AS) ranked the concealment of allocation and checked the final manuscript. The fourth author (DM) cross checked all stages of the review process.
Eight trials with 968 participants were included. The average age was 67 and all trials included men and women. Participants were followed for up to two years.There was a small but statistically significant improvement in primary angiographic and duplex patency at six months in patients treated with PTA plus stent over lesions treated with PTA alone (three trials and four trials, respectively). However, primary angiographic patency was non-significant 12 months (five trials, P = 0.23) and 24 months (two trials, P = 0.45). A similar but lesser effect was seen for ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI), while a more pronounced improvement in treadmill walking distance in patients with PTA plus stent insertion was observed at six and 12 (P < 0.0001), but not 24 months (P = 0.81). Only one trial reported quality of life, which showed no significant difference between patients treated with PTA alone or PTA with stent insertion at any time interval. Antiplatelet therapy protocols and inclusion criteria between trials showed marked heterogenicity.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is limited benefit to stenting lesions of the superficial femoral artery in addition to angioplasty, however this cannot be recommended routinely based on the results of this analysis.
下肢外周动脉疾病(PAD)是全身动脉粥样硬化常见且重要的表现形式。股浅动脉狭窄或闭塞可能早期就导致间歇性跛行,可通过有或无支架植入的球囊血管成形术进行治疗。
旨在确定经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)与PTA联合支架植入术相比,对患有间歇性跛行或严重肢体缺血的股浅动脉病变患者的疗效。
Cochrane外周血管疾病(PVD)小组检索了他们的试验注册库(最后检索时间为2009年2月)以及Cochrane图书馆(2009年第1期)中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL),以查找描述有或无支架植入的经皮血管成形术随机对照试验(RCT)的出版物。
单纯血管成形术与血管成形术联合支架植入术治疗股浅动脉狭窄的随机试验。
两位作者(CT、JC)独立选择合适的试验,评估试验质量并提取数据。第三位作者(AS)对分配的隐匿性进行排序并检查最终稿件。第四位作者(DM)对综述过程的所有阶段进行交叉核对。
纳入了8项试验,共968名参与者。平均年龄为67岁,所有试验均纳入了男性和女性。对参与者随访长达两年。与单纯接受PTA治疗的病变相比,接受PTA加支架植入治疗的患者在6个月时的初次血管造影和双功超声通畅率有小幅但具有统计学意义的改善(分别为3项试验和4项试验)。然而,12个月时初次血管造影通畅率无统计学意义(5项试验,P = 0.23),24个月时也无统计学意义(2项试验,P = 0.45)。踝肱压力指数(ABPI)也有类似但较小的效果,而接受PTA加支架植入的患者在6个月和12个月时跑步机行走距离有更明显的改善(P < 0.0001),但24个月时无改善(P = 0.81)。只有一项试验报告了生活质量,结果显示在任何时间间隔,单纯接受PTA治疗的患者与接受PTA加支架植入治疗的患者之间均无显著差异。各试验之间的抗血小板治疗方案和纳入标准存在明显异质性。
除血管成形术外,对股浅动脉病变进行支架植入的益处有限,然而基于本分析结果,不能常规推荐这种治疗方法。