Putaala Jukka, Metso Tiina M, Metso Antti J, Mäkelä Elina, Haapaniemi Elena, Salonen Oili, Kaste Markku, Tatlisumak Turgut
Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, FIN-00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2085-91. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541185. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
No exclusive systematic data exist on the safety and outcomes of thrombolytic treatment in young patients with ischemic stroke.
We evaluated all 48 patients aged 16 to 49 years with hemispheric ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase in Helsinki University Central Hospital from 1994 to 2007. For comparison of outcome, we selected, blinded to outcome data, 96 control subjects (1:2) with ischemic stroke not treated with alteplase matched by age, gender, and admission stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale). We selected similarly 96 older alteplase-treated gender and arrival National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score-matched patients (aged, 50 to 79 years) for comparison of outcome and hemorrhage rate. A 3-month favorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was defined according to the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke Monitor Study.
Young alteplase-treated patients (67% males; mean age, 38.8+/-9.1 years) more often recovered completely (27% versus 10%, P=0.010) and achieved a favorable outcome (40% versus 22%, P=0.025) compared with their age-matched control subjects not treated with alteplase. In alteplase-treated patients, unfavorable outcome was more frequent in males and in those with carotid artery dissection. We observed no difference in outcome between cases and older control subjects treated with alteplase. However, none of the cases had symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage versus 3 (3%) in the older control group (P=0.551). Mortality rate was 2% (P=0.552) in age-matched control subjects and 7% (P=0.095) among older control subjects, whereas none of the case patients died during the 3-month follow-up.
Young adults with acute hemispheric ischemic stroke benefited from intravenous thrombolysis with good safety.
目前尚无关于青年缺血性脑卒中患者溶栓治疗安全性及预后的专门系统性数据。
我们评估了1994年至2007年在赫尔辛基大学中心医院接受静脉注射阿替普酶治疗的所有48例年龄在16至49岁的半球性缺血性脑卒中患者。为比较预后,我们在对预后数据不知情的情况下,选择了96名未接受阿替普酶治疗的缺血性脑卒中对照者(1:2),这些对照者在年龄、性别和入院时的脑卒中严重程度(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表)方面相匹配。我们同样选择了96名年龄较大(50至79岁)、接受阿替普酶治疗、性别和入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分相匹配的患者,以比较预后和出血率。3个月时的良好预后定义为改良Rankin量表评分为0至1分。症状性脑出血根据“卒中溶栓安全实施监测研究”进行定义。
与未接受阿替普酶治疗的年龄匹配对照者相比,接受阿替普酶治疗的青年患者(67%为男性;平均年龄38.8±9.1岁)更常完全康复(27%对10%,P = 0.010)且获得良好预后(40%对22%,P = 0.025)。在接受阿替普酶治疗的患者中,男性及患有颈动脉夹层的患者不良预后更为常见。我们观察到接受阿替普酶治疗的病例与年龄较大的对照者在预后方面无差异。然而,病例组无一例发生症状性脑出血,而老年对照组有3例(3%)发生(P = 0.551)。年龄匹配对照组的死亡率为2%(P = 0.552),老年对照组为7%(P = 0.095),而病例组患者在3个月随访期间均未死亡。
患有急性半球性缺血性脑卒中的青年成人从静脉溶栓治疗中获益,且安全性良好。