Dworkin Shari L, Fullilove Robert E, Peacock Dean
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jun;99(6):981-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.149625. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
Although gender-specific theories are often deployed in interventions to reduce women's HIV risks, the same is often not true for interventions among men. Theories of masculinity are not guiding most US research on the risky sexual behavior of heterosexual men or on what can be done to intervene. We first assess the extent to which evidence-based HIV-prevention interventions among heterosexually active men in the United States draw upon relevant theories of masculinity. Next, we introduce a useful framework within masculinity and gender studies that can be applied to HIV-prevention interventions with heterosexually active men. Finally, we make suggestions to improve the gender specificity of HIV-prevention interventions for heterosexually active men in the United States.
尽管针对性别的理论经常被用于减少女性感染艾滋病毒风险的干预措施中,但在针对男性的干预措施中情况往往并非如此。男性气质理论并未指导美国大多数关于异性恋男性危险性行为或干预措施的研究。我们首先评估美国性活跃异性恋男性中基于证据的艾滋病毒预防干预措施在多大程度上借鉴了相关的男性气质理论。接下来,我们介绍一个在男性气质和性别研究中有用的框架,该框架可应用于对性活跃异性恋男性的艾滋病毒预防干预。最后,我们提出建议,以提高美国性活跃异性恋男性艾滋病毒预防干预措施的性别针对性。