Laoruengthana Artit, Pattayakorn Somsak, Chotanaputhi Thanainit, Kosiyatrakul Arkaphat
Department of Orthopaedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Apr;92(4):491-7.
Many randomized clinical trials demonstrated that 4-strand hamstring tendon grafts have comparable results both subjectively and objectively with the patellar tendon grafts. The authors hypothesized that the increment of hamstring tendons strength with 6-strand graft could improve the knee stability compared to the result from using the gold standard patellar tendon.
Thirty-four patients were prospectively randomized into two groups for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Seventeen patients underwent reconstruction with 6-strand hamstring tendons and the remaining seventeen were treated with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Patients were followed-up under the similar rehabilitation protocol for at least 12 months. At the time of final follow-up, all the patients in both groups were evaluated in terms of patient's satisfaction, activity level, and knee stability.
Fifteen patients in bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (two lost to follow-up) and thirteen patients used 6-strand hamstring tendons (four were converted to 4-strand hamstring tendons) were evaluated at a mean of 19 months (range 12-31 months). The mean of KT-2000 side-to-side laxity measurement in 6-strand hamstring group (0.96 mm) is less than BPTB group (1.22 mm) significantly (p < 0.05). Eleven of 13 patients (84.62%) that received the 6-strand hamstring tendons could return to sport activities compared to 10 of 15 patients (66.67%) that received BPTB graft. Hamstring group have a lower prevalence of donor-site morbidity resulting in less difficult in kneeling.
The authors concluded that using 6-strand hamstring tendons could improve knee stability in the early clinical outcomes. With no difference in subjective assessment, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction used hamstring tendons have less donor-site morbidity, which is more compatible to Asian life-style.
许多随机临床试验表明,四股绳肌腱移植在主观和客观上与髌腱移植效果相当。作者推测,与使用金标准髌腱的结果相比,六股移植绳肌腱强度的增加可改善膝关节稳定性。
34例患者被前瞻性随机分为两组,进行关节镜下前交叉韧带重建。17例患者接受六股绳肌腱重建,其余17例采用骨-髌腱-骨移植治疗。患者按照相似的康复方案随访至少12个月。在末次随访时,对两组所有患者的满意度、活动水平和膝关节稳定性进行评估。
骨-髌腱-骨移植组15例患者(2例失访)和六股绳肌腱组13例患者(4例转为四股绳肌腱)在平均19个月(范围12 - 31个月)时接受评估。六股绳肌腱组KT - 2000侧方松弛度测量平均值(0.96 mm)显著低于骨-髌腱-骨组(1.22 mm)(p < 0.05)。接受六股绳肌腱的13例患者中有11例(84.62%)可恢复体育活动,而接受骨-髌腱-骨移植的15例患者中有10例(66.67%)可恢复。绳肌腱组供区并发症发生率较低,导致跪姿困难减轻。
作者得出结论,使用六股绳肌腱可改善早期临床结果中的膝关节稳定性。在主观评估无差异的情况下,使用绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的供区并发症较少,这与亚洲生活方式更相符。