Suppr超能文献

口语中的正字法效应:在线激活还是语音重构?

Orthographic effects in spoken language: on-line activation or phonological restructuring?

机构信息

Aix-Marseille University, France.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2009 Jun 12;1275:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.018. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that literacy (i.e., learning to read and spell) affects spoken language processing. However, there is an on-going debate about the nature of this influence. Some argued that orthography is co-activated on-line whenever we hear a spoken word. Others suggested that orthography is not activated on-line but has changed the nature of the phonological representations. Finally, both effects might occur simultaneously, that is, orthography might be activated on-line in addition to having changed the nature of the phonological representations. Previous studies have not been able to tease apart these hypotheses. The present study started by replicating the finding of an orthographic consistency effect in spoken word recognition using event-related brain potentials (ERPs): words with multiple spellings (i.e., inconsistent words) differed from words with unique spellings (i.e., consistent words) as early as 330 ms after the onset of the target. We then employed standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) to determine the possible underlying cortical generators of this effect. The results showed that the orthographic consistency effect was clearly localized in a classic phonological area (left BA40). No evidence was found for activation in the posterior cortical areas coding orthographic information, such as the visual word form area in the left fusiform gyrus (BA37). This finding is consistent with the restructuring hypothesis according to which phonological representations are "contaminated" by orthographic knowledge.

摘要

先前的研究表明,读写能力(即学习阅读和拼写)会影响口语处理。然而,关于这种影响的本质,一直存在争议。一些人认为,无论何时我们听到一个口语单词,拼写都会在线被共同激活。另一些人则认为,拼写不会在线激活,但它改变了语音表征的性质。最后,这两种影响可能同时发生,也就是说,拼写可能会在线被激活,同时也改变了语音表征的性质。先前的研究无法区分这些假设。本研究首先通过事件相关脑电位(ERPs)复制了口语识别中存在的正字法一致性效应的发现:具有多个拼写的单词(即不一致的单词)与具有唯一拼写的单词(即一致的单词)不同,早在目标出现后 330 毫秒就有所不同。然后,我们使用标准化低分辨率电磁断层成像术(sLORETA)来确定该效应的可能潜在皮质发生器。结果表明,正字法一致性效应明显定位于经典的语音区域(左侧 BA40)。没有发现证据表明在编码正字法信息的皮质后区域(例如左侧梭状回中的视觉单词形式区域 BA37)有激活。这一发现与重构假说一致,根据该假说,语音表征会被正字法知识“污染”。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验