Zubaran Carlos, Foresti Kátia
School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 May;22(3):281-6. doi: 10.1097/yco.0b013e328328d154.
Quality of life (QoL) has become an important clinical and research outcome in clinical drug and alcohol studies. Yet, further advancement in this field is hindered by the lack of a consensual definition of QoL in that often investigators use the constructs of health status and QoL interchangeably. This article reviews the conceptual definitions of QoL as a researchable construct. It also presents the most commonly used questionnaires to evaluate QoL in the context of substance use.
In the area of substance use research, the evaluation of QoL has been conducted mainly via generic instruments. Most of the studies reporting results of QoL measurements have obtained their data from opiate users receiving different treatment modalities at various healthcare agencies. Recent studies have used the Injection Drug User QoL Scale as a specific assessment tool. Specific QoL instruments have also been developed in the area of alcohol and nicotine dependence.
QoL is an important clinical and research outcome in the context of substance use. However, the indiscriminate use of nonspecific measurement tools may produce questionable results. A new generation of specific tools takes into particular consideration the life areas that have a greater influence on the QoL of substance users. It is hoped that the new impetus toward a specific QoL assessment in the context of substance use will promote further scientific advancement in this area.
生活质量(QoL)已成为临床药物和酒精研究中一项重要的临床及研究成果。然而,该领域的进一步发展受到生活质量缺乏共识性定义的阻碍,因为研究人员常常将健康状况和生活质量的概念互换使用。本文回顾了生活质量作为一个可研究概念的概念性定义。它还介绍了在物质使用背景下评估生活质量最常用的问卷。
在物质使用研究领域,生活质量的评估主要通过通用工具进行。大多数报告生活质量测量结果的研究是从在不同医疗机构接受不同治疗方式的阿片类药物使用者那里获取数据的。最近的研究使用了注射吸毒者生活质量量表作为一种特定的评估工具。在酒精和尼古丁依赖领域也开发了特定的生活质量工具。
在物质使用背景下,生活质量是一项重要的临床和研究成果。然而,不加区分地使用非特定测量工具可能会产生有问题的结果。新一代特定工具特别考虑了对物质使用者生活质量有更大影响的生活领域。希望在物质使用背景下对特定生活质量评估的新推动将促进该领域的进一步科学发展。