Nyman Ulf, Björk Jonas, Lindström Veronica, Grubb Anders
Department of Radiology, Lasarettet Trelleborg, Trelleborg, Sweden.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2008;68(7):568-76. doi: 10.1080/00365510801915163.
To evaluate the clinical performance in a paediatric population of the Lund-Malmö creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prediction equations, primarily developed for adults.
Iohexol clearance was used as the gold standard in 85 paediatric Caucasian patients (0.3-17 years; 37 F/48 M). One Lund-Malmö equation was based on age and gender (LM) and one included lean body mass (LM-LBM). Comparisons focused on correlation (adjusted R2), bias (median percent error) and accuracy (proportions of predicted GFR differing < or = 30% from measured GFR) (mL/min/1.73 m2). The performances were compared with those of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation, a dedicated paediatric creatinine equation, Counahan-Barratt (CB) and a cystatin C-based equation.
The MDRD equation performed poorly with a median bias of 96%. Of the remaining equations, only the LM-LBM produced significant bias (+10% in median) according to line of identity regression analysis. The LM equation yielded marginally higher accuracy (76%) than the LM-LBM equation (74%) and the CB (73%), but lower than the cystatin C-based equation (82%). However, the estimated accuracy figures for these four equations were generally imprecise and none of the differences compared with the LM equation was statistically significant.
In contrast to most creatinine-based GFR prediction equations, the LM equation performs adequately for both children and adults. This may be due to the unique model-building principles used when the LM equation was established. Further validation in a larger paediatric population is necessary.
评估主要为成人开发的基于肌酐的Lund-Malmö肾小球滤过率(GFR)预测方程在儿科人群中的临床性能。
以碘海醇清除率作为85名儿科白种人患者(0.3 - 17岁;37名女性/48名男性)的金标准。一个Lund-Malmö方程基于年龄和性别(LM),另一个包含瘦体重(LM-LBM)。比较重点在于相关性(调整后的R2)、偏差(中位百分比误差)和准确性(预测GFR与测量GFR相差≤30%的比例)(mL/min/1.73 m2)。将这些性能与肾脏疾病饮食改良(MDRD)研究方程、专用儿科肌酐方程、Counahan-Barratt(CB)方程和基于胱抑素C的方程进行比较。
MDRD方程表现不佳,中位偏差为96%。在其余方程中,根据一致性回归分析,只有LM-LBM产生了显著偏差(中位偏差为 +10%)。LM方程的准确性(76%)略高于LM-LBM方程(74%)和CB方程(73%),但低于基于胱抑素C的方程(82%)。然而,这四个方程的估计准确性数据总体上不准确,与LM方程相比,没有一个差异具有统计学意义。
与大多数基于肌酐的GFR预测方程不同,LM方程在儿童和成人中均表现良好。这可能归因于建立LM方程时所采用的独特模型构建原则。有必要在更大的儿科人群中进行进一步验证。