Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2019 Jun;34(6):1087-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-4185-y. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
Most validations of paediatric glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations using standardized creatinine (CR) and cystatin C (CYS) assays have comprised relatively small cohorts, which makes accuracy across subgroups of GFR, age, body mass index (BMI) and gender uncertain. To overcome this, a large cohort of children referred for GFR determination has been established from several European medical centres.
Three thousand four hundred eight measurements of GFR (mGFR) using plasma clearance of exogenous substances were performed in 2218 children aged 2-17 years. Validated equations included Schwartz-2009/2012, FAS, LMR, Schwartz-Lyon, Berg, CAPA, CKD-EPI, Andersen and arithmetic means of the best single-marker equations in explorative analysis. Five metrics were used to compare the performance of the GFR equations: bias, precision and three accuracy measures including the percentage of GFR estimates (eGFR) within ± 10% (P) and ± 30% (P) of mGFR.
Three of the cystatin C equations, Berg, CAPA and CKD-EPI, exhibited low bias and generally satisfactory accuracy across all levels of mGFR; CKD-EPI had more stable performance across gender than the two other equations. Among creatinine equations, Schwartz-Lyon had the best performance but was inaccurate at mGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m and in underweight patients. Arithmetic means of the best creatinine and cystatin C equations above improved bias compared to the existing composite creatinine+cystatin C equations.
The present study strongly suggests that cystatin C should be the primary biomarker of choice when estimating GFR in children with decreased GFR. Arithmetic means of well-performing single-marker equations improve accuracy further at most mGFR levels and have practical advantages compared to composite equations.
大多数使用标准化肌酐(CR)和胱抑素 C(CYS)检测的儿科肾小球滤过率(GFR)估算方程的验证都包含相对较小的队列,这使得 GFR、年龄、体重指数(BMI)和性别亚组的准确性不确定。为了克服这一问题,已经从几个欧洲医疗中心建立了一个由大量儿童组成的 GFR 测定队列。
对 2218 名 2-17 岁儿童进行了 3408 次使用外源性物质血浆清除率测定的 GFR(mGFR)测量。验证方程包括 Schwartz-2009/2012、FAS、LMR、Schwartz-Lyon、Berg、CAPA、CKD-EPI、Andersen 和探索性分析中最佳单标志物方程的算术平均值。使用五个指标来比较 GFR 方程的性能:偏差、精度和三个准确性指标,包括 eGFR 估计值(eGFR)与 mGFR 的百分比在±10%(P)和±30%(P)以内的比例。
三种胱抑素 C 方程(Berg、CAPA 和 CKD-EPI)表现出低偏差,在所有 mGFR 水平上具有较好的准确性;与另外两种方程相比,CKD-EPI 在性别方面具有更稳定的性能。在肌酐方程中,Schwartz-Lyon 表现最好,但在 mGFR<30 mL/min/1.73 m 和体重不足的患者中不准确。优于现有复合肌酐+胱抑素 C 方程的最佳肌酐和胱抑素 C 方程的算术平均值提高了偏差。
本研究强烈表明,当估计 GFR 降低的儿童的 GFR 时,胱抑素 C 应成为首选的生物标志物。性能良好的单标志物方程的算术平均值进一步提高了大多数 mGFR 水平的准确性,与复合方程相比具有实际优势。