• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较评估危重症儿童外周灌注的三种方法。

Comparing three methods of assessing peripheral perfusion in critically ill children.

作者信息

Ridling Debra A, Kroon Leah

机构信息

ICU, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;35(1):11-5, 42.

PMID:19378569
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of peripheral perfusion is a standard practice in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), which includes the qualitative assessment of foot warmth. The perfusion indicator, derived from the pulse oximetry signal, is available, along with some bedside monitors.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the correlation between RN qualitative assessment of foot warmth, measured foot temperature, and perfusion indicator.

METHODS

Simultaneous measurements of qualitative foot warmth, measured foot temperature, and perfusion indicator value were obtained on 39 critically ill children ages newborn to 18 years, at least every 2 hours for 48 hours, with 859 measurements completed.

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between all three parameters (p = < 0.0001); however, there was a large amount of variability within groups.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative assessment of foot warmth and peripheral perfusion indicator may be helpful in assessing the perfusion in critically ill pediatric patients, but neither is predictably specific as compared to measured foot temperature.

摘要

背景

评估外周灌注是儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的一项标准操作,其中包括对足部温暖度的定性评估。一些床边监护仪可提供源自脉搏血氧饱和度信号的灌注指标。

目的

描述护士对足部温暖度的定性评估、测量的足部温度与灌注指标之间的相关性。

方法

对39名年龄从新生儿到18岁的危重症患儿同时进行足部温暖度定性评估、测量足部温度及获取灌注指标值,在48小时内至少每2小时进行一次,共完成859次测量。

结果

所有三个参数之间均呈正相关(p = < 0.0001);然而,各组内存在大量变异性。

结论

足部温暖度的定性评估和外周灌注指标可能有助于评估危重症儿科患者的灌注情况,但与测量的足部温度相比,两者都没有可预测的特异性。

相似文献

1
Comparing three methods of assessing peripheral perfusion in critically ill children.比较评估危重症儿童外周灌注的三种方法。
Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;35(1):11-5, 42.
2
Relationship between nurses' assessments of perfusion and toe temperature in pediatric patients with cardiovascular disease.患有心血管疾病的儿科患者中护士对灌注的评估与趾温之间的关系。
Heart Lung. 1988 Mar;17(2):157-65.
3
The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients.危重症患者外周灌注主观评估的预后价值
Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):934-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819869db.
4
Pulse oximeter accuracy and precision affected by sensor location in cyanotic children.脉搏血氧仪的准确性和精确性受紫绀型儿童传感器位置的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;9(4):393-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181727967.
5
Foot pulse oximeter perfusion index correlates with calf muscle perfusion measured by near-infrared spectroscopy in healthy neonates.足脉搏血氧饱和度仪灌注指数与健康新生儿通过近红外光谱法测量的小腿肌肉灌注相关。
J Perinatol. 2005 Jun;25(6):417-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211328.
6
Drug use density in critically ill children and newborns: analysis of various methodologies.危重症儿童和新生儿的药物使用密度:多种方法的分析
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;10(4):495-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181a3101e.
7
The reliability of continuous noninvasive finger blood pressure measurement in critically ill children.危重症患儿连续无创手指血压测量的可靠性
Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):814-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318194f401.
8
[Use of laser Doppler to assess peripheral tissue perfusion in critically ill children].[使用激光多普勒评估危重症儿童的外周组织灌注]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2013 Jun;78(6):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2012.09.019. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
9
[Effectiveness of hemodynamic treatment guided by gastric intramucosal pH monitoring].[胃黏膜内pH监测指导下血流动力学治疗的有效性]
An Esp Pediatr. 2000 Apr;52(4):339-45.
10
Inter-hospital transport of critically ill children.危重症儿童的院际转运
Ir Med J. 2009 Oct;102(9):288-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Shock by Peripheral Perfusion Index.外周灌注指数预测休克。
Indian J Pediatr. 2019 Oct;86(10):903-908. doi: 10.1007/s12098-019-02993-6. Epub 2019 Jun 13.