Suppr超能文献

骶旁坐骨神经阻滞与臀下坐骨神经阻滞时0.5%布比卡因(对映体过量50%,即S75/R25)联合1:200,000肾上腺素的血浆水平比较。

Comparison of the plasma levels of 50% enantiomeric excess (S75/R25) 0.5% bupivacaine combined with 1:200,000 epinephrine between the parasacral and infragluteal sciatic nerve blocks.

作者信息

Helayel Pablo Escovedo, Bussman André Roberto, da Conceição Diogo Brüggemann, de Oliveira Filho Getúlio Rodrigues

机构信息

Núcleo de Ensino e Pesquisa em Anestesia Regional do CET/SBA Integrado de Anestesiologia da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de Santa Catarina do Hospital Governador Celso Ramos, Florianópolis, SC.

出版信息

Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;58(4):323-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942008000400001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Local anesthetics (LA) are safe drugs when the proper dose and localization are used. The rate of absorption of the local anesthetic depends on its mass and blood flow at the site of the injection. The objective of this study was to analyze the plasma concentration of 50% enantiomeric excess (S75R25) 0.5% bupivacaine combined with 1:200,000 epinephrine in the parasacral (PS) and infragluteal (IG) sciatic nerve block (SNB).

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients scheduled for ankle and foot surgeries were randomly divided into two groups in this prospective study. In Group 1, SNB was performed with IG neurostimulation, while in Group 2 the PS method was used. Both groups received 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (S75/R25) with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Arterial blood samples, 5 mL, were drawn at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes after the administration of the LA. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to analyze the serum concentrations. Demographic data of both groups were compared using the Student t test for independent samples and Fisher's Exact test. Bifactorial Analysis of Variance for repeated samples was used for the data concerning the plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

Groups 1 and 2 showed no significant demographic differences. The maximal concentration (Cmax) in Group 1 (308 +/- 91 ng.mL(-1)) was obtained in samples number 5 (90 minutes), while in Group 2 (425 +/- 280 ng.mL(-1)) it was obtained in samples number 2 (15 minutes). Cases of systemic toxicity were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Cmax of 0.5 % bupivacaine (S75/R25) with 1:200,000 in the parasacral approach was higher when compared with the infragluteal SNB.

摘要

背景与目的

当使用适当剂量并进行正确定位时,局部麻醉药(LA)是安全的药物。局部麻醉药的吸收速率取决于其剂量以及注射部位的血流情况。本研究的目的是分析50%对映体过量(S75R25)的0.5%布比卡因与1:200,000肾上腺素联合用于骶旁(PS)和臀下(IG)坐骨神经阻滞(SNB)时的血浆浓度。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,将28例计划进行踝关节和足部手术的患者随机分为两组。第1组采用IG神经刺激法进行SNB,而第2组采用PS法。两组均接受30 mL含1:200,000肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因(S75/R25)。在给予局部麻醉药后的0、15、30、60和90分钟采集5 mL动脉血样。采用高效液相色谱法分析血清浓度。两组的人口统计学数据使用独立样本的Student t检验和Fisher精确检验进行比较。对于血浆浓度数据,使用重复样本的双因素方差分析。

结果

第1组和第2组在人口统计学方面无显著差异。第1组的最大浓度(Cmax)(308±91 ng.mL⁻¹)在第5个样本(90分钟)时测得,而第2组(425±280 ng.mL⁻¹)在第2个样本(15分钟)时测得。未观察到全身毒性病例。

结论

与臀下坐骨神经阻滞相比,骶旁入路使用1:200,000的0.5%布比卡因(S75/R25)时的Cmax更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验