Kalender Willi A, Deak Paul, Kellermeier Markus, van Straten Marcel, Vollmar Sabrina V
Institute of Medical Physics, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestr 91 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
Med Phys. 2009 Mar;36(3):993-1007. doi: 10.1118/1.3075901.
Although x-ray computed tomography (CT) has been in clinical use for over 3 decades, spectral optimization has not been a topic of great concern; high voltages around 120 kV have been in use since the beginning of CT. It is the purpose of this study to analyze, in a rigorous manner, the energies at which the patient dose necessary to provide a given contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for various diagnostic tasks can be minimized. The authors used cylindrical water phantoms and quasianthropomorphic phantoms of the thorax and the abdomen with inserts of 13 mm diameter mimicking soft tissue, bone, and iodine for simulations and measurements. To provide clearly defined contrasts, these inserts were made of solid water with a 1% difference in density (DD) to represent an energy-independent soft-tissue contrast of 10 Hounsfield units (HU), calcium hydroxyapatite (Ca) representing bone, and iodine (I) representing the typical contrast medium. To evaluate CT of the thorax, an adult thorax phantom (300 x 200 mm2) plus extension rings up to a size of 460 x 300 mm2 to mimic different patient cross sections were used. For CT of the abdomen, we used a phantom of 360 x 200 mm2 and an extension ring of 460 x 300 mm2. The CT scanner that the authors used was a SOMATOM Definition (Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) at 80, 100, 120, and 140 kV. Further voltage settings of 60, 75, 90, and 105 kV were available in an experimental mode. The authors determined contrast for the density difference, calcium, and iodine, and noise and 3D dose distributions for the available voltages by measurements. Additional voltage values and monoenergetic sources were evaluated by simulations. The dose-weighted contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRD) was used as the parameter for optimization. Simulations and measurements were in good agreement with respect to absolute values and trends regarding the dependence on energy for the parameters investigated. For soft-tissue imaging, the standard settings of 120-140 kV were found as adequate choices with optimal values increasing for larger cross sections, e.g., for large abdomens voltages higher than 140 kV may be indicated. For bone and iodine imaging the optimum values were generally found at significantly lower voltages of typically below 80 kV. This offers a potential for dose reduction of up to 50%, but demands significantly higher power values in most cases. The authors concluded that voltage settings in CT should be varied more often than is common in practice today and should be chosen not only according to patient size but also according to the substance imaged in order to minimize dose while not compromising image quality. A reduction from 120 to 80 kV, for example, would yield a reduction in patient dose by more than half for coronary CT angiography. The use of lower voltages has to be recommended for contrast medium studies in cardiac and pediatric CT.
尽管X射线计算机断层扫描(CT)已在临床应用超过30年,但光谱优化一直不是备受关注的话题;自CT问世以来,120 kV左右的高电压一直在使用。本研究的目的是以严谨的方式分析,对于各种诊断任务,在提供给定对比度噪声比(CNR)所需的患者剂量最小化时的能量。作者使用了圆柱形水模体以及胸部和腹部的准人体模体,其中插入了直径13 mm的模拟软组织、骨骼和碘的物体进行模拟和测量。为了提供明确界定的对比度,这些插入物由密度相差1%(DD)的固体水制成,以代表10亨氏单位(HU)的与能量无关的软组织对比度,用羟基磷灰石钙(Ca)代表骨骼,用碘(I)代表典型的造影剂。为了评估胸部CT,使用了一个成人胸部模体(300×200 mm²)以及尺寸达460×300 mm²的延伸环,以模拟不同的患者横截面。对于腹部CT,使用了一个360×200 mm²的模体和一个460×300 mm²的延伸环。作者使用的CT扫描仪是一台西门子医疗(德国福希海姆)的SOMATOM Definition,电压设置为80、100、120和140 kV。在实验模式下还可提供60、75、90和105 kV的进一步电压设置。作者通过测量确定了密度差异、钙和碘的对比度,以及可用电压下的噪声和三维剂量分布。通过模拟评估了额外的电压值和单能源。剂量加权对比度噪声比(CNRD)用作优化参数。关于所研究参数对能量的依赖性,模拟和测量在绝对值和趋势方面吻合良好。对于软组织成像,发现120 - 140 kV的标准设置是合适的选择,对于较大横截面,最佳值会增加,例如对于大腹部,可能需要高于140 kV的电压。对于骨骼和碘成像,最佳值通常在明显更低的电压下,通常低于80 kV。这提供了高达50%的剂量降低潜力,但在大多数情况下需要显著更高的功率值。作者得出结论,CT中的电压设置应比当今实践中更频繁地变化,并且不仅应根据患者体型选择,还应根据所成像的物质选择,以便在不影响图像质量的情况下最小化剂量。例如,从120 kV降至80 kV,对于冠状动脉CT血管造影,患者剂量将减少一半以上。对于心脏和儿科CT中的造影剂研究,必须推荐使用更低的电压。