Mukhopadhyay Parag, Wipf Peter, Beratan David N
Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.
Acc Chem Res. 2009 Jun 16;42(6):809-19. doi: 10.1021/ar8002859.
Modern chemistry emerged from the quest to describe the three-dimensional structure of molecules: van't Hoff's tetravalent carbon placed symmetry and dissymmetry at the heart of chemistry. In this Account, we explore how modern theory, synthesis, and spectroscopy can be used in concert to elucidate the symmetry and dissymmetry of molecules and their assemblies. Chiroptical spectroscopy, including optical rotatory dispersion (ORD), electronic circular dichroism (ECD), vibrational circular dichroism (VCD), and Raman optical activity (ROA), measures the response of dissymmetric structures to electromagnetic radiation. This response can in turn reveal the arrangement of atoms in space, but deciphering the molecular information encoded in chiroptical spectra requires an effective theoretical approach. Although important correlations between ECD and molecular stereochemistry have existed for some time, a battery of accurate new theoretical methods that link a much wider range of chiroptical spectroscopies to structure have emerged over the past decade. The promise of this field is considerable: theory and spectroscopy can assist in assigning the relative and absolute configurations of complex products, revealing the structure of noncovalent aggregates, defining metrics for molecular diversity based on polarization response, and designing chirally imprinted nanomaterials. The physical organic chemistry of chirality is fascinating in its own right: defining atomic and group contributions to optical rotation (OR) is now possible. Although the common expectation is that chiroptical response is determined solely by a chiral solute's electronic structure in a given environment, chiral imprinting effects on the surrounding medium and molecular assembly can, in fact, dominate the chiroptical signatures. The theoretical interpretation of chiroptical markers is challenging because the optical properties are subtle, resulting from the strong electric dipole and the weaker electric quadrupole and magnetic dipole perturbations by the electromagnetic field. Moreover, OR arises from a combination of nearly canceling contributions to the electronic response. Indeed, the challenge posed by the chiroptical properties delayed the advent of even qualitatively accurate descriptions for some chiroptical signatures until the past decade when, for example, prediction of the observed sign of experimental OR became accessible to theory. The computation of chiroptical signatures, in close coordination with synthesis and spectroscopy, provides a powerful framework to diagnose and interpret the dissymmetry of chemical structures and molecular assemblies. Chiroptical theory now produces new schemes to elucidate structure, to describe the specific molecular sources of chiroptical signatures, and to assist in our understanding of how dissymmetry is templated and propagated in the condensed phase.
范托夫的四价碳将对称性和不对称性置于化学的核心位置。在本综述中,我们探讨如何协同运用现代理论、合成方法和光谱学来阐明分子及其聚集体的对称性和不对称性。手性光谱学,包括旋光色散(ORD)、电子圆二色性(ECD)、振动圆二色性(VCD)和拉曼光学活性(ROA),用于测量不对称结构对电磁辐射的响应。这种响应进而能够揭示原子在空间中的排列方式,然而解读手性光谱中编码的分子信息需要一种有效的理论方法。尽管ECD与分子立体化学之间的重要关联已存在一段时间,但在过去十年中出现了一系列准确的新理论方法,这些方法将更广泛的手性光谱学与结构联系起来。该领域前景广阔:理论和光谱学可助力确定复杂产物的相对和绝对构型,揭示非共价聚集体的结构,基于极化响应定义分子多样性的度量标准,并设计手性印迹纳米材料。手性的物理有机化学本身就极具魅力:现在能够确定原子和基团对旋光性(OR)的贡献。尽管通常认为手性光谱响应仅由给定环境中手性溶质的电子结构决定,但实际上,手性对周围介质和分子聚集体的印迹效应可能主导手性光谱特征。手性标记物的理论解释具有挑战性,因为光学性质很微妙,是由电磁场的强电偶极以及较弱的电四极和磁偶极扰动导致的。此外,OR源于对电子响应的几乎相互抵消的贡献的组合。事实上,手性性质带来的挑战使得即使是对某些手性光谱特征进行定性准确描述的理论也姗姗来迟,直到过去十年,例如理论才能够预测实验测得的OR的符号。手性光谱特征的计算与合成和光谱学紧密配合,为诊断和解释化学结构及分子聚集体的不对称性提供了一个强大的框架。手性理论现在产生了新的方案来阐明结构,描述手性光谱特征的具体分子来源,并帮助我们理解不对称性在凝聚相中是如何被模板化和传播的。