Hansegård Jøger, Urheim Stig, Lunde Ketil, Malm Siri, Rabben Stein Inge
GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009 Apr 20;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-7-18.
Recent studies have shown that real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography (RT3DE) gives more accurate and reproducible left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) measurements than traditional two-dimensional methods. A new semi-automated tool (4DLVQ) for volume measurements in RT3DE has been developed. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of this method compared to a 3D echo standard.
LV end-diastolic volumes (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV), and EF measured using 4DLVQ were compared with a commercially available semi-automated analysis tool (TomTec 4D LV-Analysis ver. 2.2) in 35 patients. Repeated measurements were performed to investigate inter- and intra-observer variability.
Average analysis time of the new tool was 141s, significantly shorter than 261s using TomTec (p < 0.001). Bland Altman analysis revealed high agreement of measured EDV, ESV, and EF compared to TomTec (p = NS), with bias and 95% limits of agreement of 2.1 +/- 21 ml, -0.88 +/- 17 ml, and 1.6 +/- 11% for EDV, ESV, and EF respectively. Intra-observer variability of 4DLVQ vs. TomTec was 7.5 +/- 6.2 ml vs. 7.7 +/- 7.3 ml for EDV, 5.5 +/- 5.6 ml vs. 5.0 +/- 5.9 ml for ESV, and 3.0 +/- 2.7% vs. 2.1 +/- 2.0% for EF (p = NS). The inter-observer variability of 4DLVQ vs. TomTec was 9.0 +/- 5.9 ml vs. 17 +/- 6.3 ml for EDV (p < 0.05), 5.0 +/- 3.6 ml vs. 12 +/- 7.7 ml for ESV (p < 0.05), and 2.7 +/- 2.8% vs. 3.0 +/- 2.1% for EF (p = NS).
In conclusion, the new analysis tool gives rapid and reproducible measurements of LV volumes and EF, with good agreement compared to another RT3DE volume quantification tool.
最近的研究表明,与传统二维方法相比,实时三维(3D)超声心动图(RT3DE)能更准确、可重复地测量左心室(LV)容积和射血分数(EF)。已开发出一种用于RT3DE容积测量的新型半自动工具(4DLVQ)。我们试图评估该方法与3D超声心动图标准相比的准确性和可重复性。
在35例患者中,将使用4DLVQ测量的左心室舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV)和EF与市售半自动分析工具(TomTec 4D LV-Analysis ver. 2.2)进行比较。进行重复测量以研究观察者间和观察者内的变异性。
新工具的平均分析时间为141秒,明显短于使用TomTec的261秒(p < 0.001)。Bland Altman分析显示,与TomTec相比,测量的EDV、ESV和EF具有高度一致性(p =无显著性差异),EDV、ESV和EF的偏差及95%一致性界限分别为2.1±21 ml、-0.8±17 ml和1.6±11%。4DLVQ与TomTec相比,观察者内变异性对于EDV分别为7.5±6.2 ml和7.7±7.3 ml,对于ESV分别为5.5±5.6 ml和5.0±5.9 ml,对于EF分别为3.0±2.7%和2.1±2.0%(p =无显著性差异)。4DLVQ与TomTec相比,观察者间变异性对于EDV分别为9.0±5.9 ml和17±6.3 ml(p < 0.05),对于ESV分别为5.0±3.6 ml和12±7.7 ml(p < 0.05),对于EF分别为2.7±2.8%和3.0±2.1%(p =无显著性差异)。
总之,新的分析工具能快速、可重复地测量左心室容积和EF,与另一种RT3DE容积定量工具相比具有良好的一致性。