• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰语使用者口吃的特征。

Characteristics of stuttering in Dutch-speaking individuals.

作者信息

Boey Ronny A, Wuyts Floris L, Van De Heyning Paul H, Heylen Louis, De Bodt Marc S

机构信息

Centre of Stuttering Therapy Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Linguist Phon. 2009 Apr;23(4):241-54. doi: 10.1080/02699200802634525.

DOI:10.1080/02699200802634525
PMID:19382012
Abstract

Clinical diagnostic procedures to distinguish stuttering from non-stuttering individuals partially rely on the observation of characteristics of stuttered words or syllables. The purpose of this study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of such a procedure, and to describe the observed characteristics of stuttered words. Methods involved the recording of the frequency, duration, and physical tension of stuttered words in conversational speech samples (total 43, 100 words) and in an oral reading task (total 43, 100 words). In this manner, 351 native Dutch speaking people, aged 8-53, who stutter were compared to a group of non-stuttering peers (n = 80). Findings suggest that applying a criterion of 3% stuttered words in conversational speech makes it possible to distinguish stuttering from non-stuttering individuals with high sensitivity (.9345) and perfect specificity (1.0000). Frequency, duration, and physical tension accompanying stuttered words are described for the group of stuttering participants, and these characteristics were compared to the group of non-stuttering speakers.

摘要

区分口吃者与非口吃者的临床诊断程序部分依赖于对口吃单词或音节特征的观察。本研究的目的是检验该程序的敏感性和特异性,并描述观察到的口吃单词的特征。研究方法包括记录对话语音样本(共43个,100个单词)和口头阅读任务(共43个,100个单词)中口吃单词的频率、持续时间和身体紧张程度。通过这种方式,将351名年龄在8至53岁之间、母语为荷兰语的口吃者与一组非口吃同龄人(n = 80)进行了比较。研究结果表明,在对话语音中应用3%的口吃单词标准,可以以高敏感性(.9345)和完美特异性(1.0000)区分口吃者与非口吃者。对口吃参与者组的口吃单词的频率、持续时间和身体紧张程度进行了描述,并将这些特征与非口吃者组进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of stuttering in Dutch-speaking individuals.荷兰语使用者口吃的特征。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2009 Apr;23(4):241-54. doi: 10.1080/02699200802634525.
2
Characteristics of stuttering-like disfluencies in Dutch-speaking children.说荷兰语儿童的口吃样不流畅性特征
J Fluency Disord. 2007;32(4):310-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
3
Differential levels of speech and manual dysfluency in adults who stutter during simultaneous drawing and speaking tasks.口吃者在同时进行绘画和说话任务时言语和手动不流畅的差异水平。
Hum Mov Sci. 2009 Oct;28(5):643-54. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
4
The distribution of phonated intervals in the speech of individuals who stutter.口吃者言语中发声间隔的分布情况。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Feb;49(1):161-71. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/013).
5
The effect of stuttering on communication: a preliminary investigation.口吃对沟通的影响:一项初步调查。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2009 Jul;23(7):473-88. doi: 10.1080/02699200902833373.
6
Stuttering and lexical category in adult Arabic speakers.成年阿拉伯语使用者的口吃与词汇类别
Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Jan;24(1):70-81. doi: 10.3109/02699200903420316.
7
Does language influence the accuracy of judgments of stuttering in children?语言会影响对儿童口吃判断的准确性吗?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Jun;52(3):766-79. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0248). Epub 2009 Apr 20.
8
Procedures used for assessment of stuttering frequency and stuttering duration.用于评估口吃频率和口吃持续时间的程序。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Dec;27(12):853-61. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.809791. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
9
Autonomic arousal in adults who stutter prior to various reading tasks intended to elicit changes in stuttering frequency.在各种旨在改变口吃频率的阅读任务之前,口吃成年人的自主唤醒。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Jan;83(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
10
Factors affecting occupational advice for speakers who do and do not stutter.影响口吃和不口吃者职业建议的因素。
J Fluency Disord. 2012 Mar;37(1):25-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Nov 23.