• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高效液相色谱法和蒸发光散射检测法测定食品中的九种人工合成甜味剂:实验室间研究

Determination of nine intense sweeteners in foodstuffs by high-performance liquid chromatography and evaporative light-scattering detection: interlaboratory study.

作者信息

Buchgraber Manuela, Wasik Andrzej

机构信息

European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Food Safety and Quality Unit, Retieseweg 111, B-2440 Geel, Belgium.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2009 Jan-Feb;92(1):208-22.

PMID:19382579
Abstract

An interlaboratory trial was conducted to validate an analytical method based on high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis with evaporative light-scattering detection for the simultaneous determination of 9 intense sweeteners, i.e., acesulfame-K, alitame, aspartame, cyclamic acid, dulcin, neotame, neohesperidine dihydrochalcone, saccharin, and sucralose in carbonated and noncarbonated soft drinks and canned or bottled fruits. Seven laboratories participated in the validation study. The majority of the samples fortified with levels close to the limit of quantification had relative standard deviation for reproducibility (RSDR) values <15%. In most cases, the recovery rates ranged between 90 and 105%, demonstrating satisfactory performance of the method. For samples fortified at levels comparable to the prescribed legal limits stipulated in the current European Union legislation, the method produces acceptably accurate, repeatable, and reproducible results. Trueness, expressed in terms of recovery rates, was demonstrated in most cases by values ranging from 90 to 108%. Comparability of results obtained by individual testing laboratories was good (RSDR values <10%) for the majority of results. Moreover, HorRat values of <1.1 suggested good performance of the method for all sweeteners and matrixes tested.

摘要

开展了一项实验室间试验,以验证一种基于高效液相色谱分析和蒸发光散射检测的分析方法,用于同时测定碳酸饮料和非碳酸软饮料以及罐装或瓶装水果中的9种高强度甜味剂,即乙酰磺胺酸钾、阿力甜、阿斯巴甜、环己基氨基磺酸、甘素、纽甜、新橙皮苷二氢查耳酮、糖精和三氯蔗糖。七个实验室参与了验证研究。大多数添加水平接近定量限的样品,其重复性相对标准偏差(RSDR)值<15%。在大多数情况下,回收率在90%至105%之间,表明该方法性能良好。对于添加水平与欧盟现行法规规定的法定限量相当的样品,该方法产生的结果具有可接受的准确性、可重复性和再现性。以回收率表示的准确性,在大多数情况下,其值范围为90%至108%。对于大多数结果,各个检测实验室获得的结果可比性良好(RSDR值<10%)。此外,<1.1的HorRat值表明该方法对所有测试的甜味剂和基质均具有良好性能。

相似文献

1
Determination of nine intense sweeteners in foodstuffs by high-performance liquid chromatography and evaporative light-scattering detection: interlaboratory study.高效液相色谱法和蒸发光散射检测法测定食品中的九种人工合成甜味剂:实验室间研究
J AOAC Int. 2009 Jan-Feb;92(1):208-22.
2
Simultaneous determination of nine intense sweeteners in foodstuffs by high performance liquid chromatography and evaporative light scattering detection--development and single-laboratory validation.高效液相色谱法与蒸发光散射检测法同时测定食品中的九种人工合成甜味剂——方法建立及单实验室验证
J Chromatogr A. 2007 Jul 20;1157(1-2):187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.068. Epub 2007 May 6.
3
Determination of nine high-intensity sweeteners in various foods by high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection.高效液相色谱-质谱联用测定多种食品中的 9 种高甜度甜味剂。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011 Jun;400(7):2159-72. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-4937-z. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
4
Simultaneous determination of sodium saccharin, aspartame, acesulfame-K and sucralose in food consumed in Korea using high-performance liquid chromatography and evaporative light-scattering detection.采用高效液相色谱法和蒸发光散射检测法同时测定韩国食用食品中的糖精钠、阿斯巴甜、安赛蜜和三氯蔗糖。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2017 May;34(5):666-677. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2017.1284348. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
5
Determination of sucralose in soft drinks by high-performance thin-layer chromatography: interlaboratory study.高效薄层色谱法测定软饮料中的三氯蔗糖:实验室间研究
J AOAC Int. 2009 Jul-Aug;92(4):1153-9.
6
Micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatographic determination of artificial sweeteners in low-Joule soft drinks and other foods.
J Chromatogr A. 1995 Mar 10;694(2):507-14. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(94)01224-3.
7
The content of high-intensity sweeteners in different categories of foods available on the Polish market.波兰市场上不同类别食品中高甜度甜味剂的含量。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2012;29(9):1391-401. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2012.699475. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
8
[Simultaneous determination of artificial sweeteners in beverage by ultra performance liquid chromatography].[超高效液相色谱法同时测定饮料中的人工甜味剂]
Se Pu. 2009 Jan;27(1):111-3.
9
Simultaneous determination of sucralose and related compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detection.高效液相色谱-蒸发光散射检测法同时测定三氯蔗糖及其相关化合物
Food Chem. 2016 Aug 1;204:358-364. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.099. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
10
Simultaneous determination of nonnutritive sweeteners in foods by HPLC/ESI-MS.采用高效液相色谱/电喷雾电离质谱联用技术同时测定食品中的非营养性甜味剂。
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Apr 22;57(8):3022-7. doi: 10.1021/jf803988u.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive.重新评估乙酰磺胺酸钾(E 950)作为食品添加剂的安全性。
EFSA J. 2025 Apr 30;23(4):e9317. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9317. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Re-evaluation of saccharin and its sodium, potassium and calcium salts (E 954) as food additives.重新评估糖精及其钠盐、钾盐和钙盐(E 954)作为食品添加剂的安全性。
EFSA J. 2024 Nov 15;22(11):e9044. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9044. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Re-evaluation of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) as a food additive.新橙皮苷二氢查耳酮(E 959)作为食品添加剂的重新评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Nov 17;20(11):e07595. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7595. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Detection of 10 sweeteners in various foods by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.采用液相色谱/串联质谱法检测各类食品中的10种甜味剂。
J Food Drug Anal. 2014 Sep;22(3):318-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.024. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
5
Detection and identification of sugar alcohol sweeteners by ion mobility spectrometry.通过离子迁移谱法检测和鉴定糖醇甜味剂
Anal Methods. 2016 Jul 28;8(28):5611-5618. doi: 10.1039/c6ay01554a. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
6
Colorimetric detection and identification of natural and artificial sweeteners.比色法检测和识别天然甜味剂与人工合成甜味剂。
Anal Chem. 2009 Aug 1;81(15):6526-33. doi: 10.1021/ac901019g.