Braden Beau R, Challoner Kathryn R, Braden Buck A, Testa Nicholas
Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, USA.
Int J Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;1(4):279-86. doi: 10.1007/s12245-008-0064-9. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
To determine if on-going modification of an international teaching course in emergency medicine will improve audience perception and receptivity.
Over 4 years, we conducted surveys during emergency medicine symposiums given in Ghana, West Africa. In 2003, 2004 and 2006, symposium interventions of content modification (lecture topics/workshops), audience modification (smaller groups, designing workshops for different levels of providers) and in-process modification (modification of lecture technique in two sequential 2006 symposiums) were done. Survey responses were analyzed to determine what interventions resulted in greater participant satisfaction. When comparing the three groups, a one-way ANOVA test was conducted to determine differences among the 3 years. When comparing two groups, Levene's test for equality of variances was conducted for annual variance, and based on that result, an independent t-test was calculated.
The one-way ANOVA test indicated that there was a statistically significant difference among the three groups (2003, 2004, 2006) of symposium participants in four questions related to the participants' perception of the instructors. The independent t-test comparing the aggregate data of 2003 and 2004 with 2006 (audience modification and in-process modification between two sequential symposiums) showed a statistically significant improvement in the participants' receptivity. The data indicated that modifying the content of international symposiums and modifying the audience to which it is addressed are equally valuable tools to ensure a positive participant receptivity. Moreover, the data indicated that "in-process" modification conducted between the two sequential 2006 symposiums produced a statistically significant increase in positive perception, facilitating knowledge transfer.
Statistical analysis of surveys coupled with modification and intervention can improve participant satisfaction in international teaching programs.
确定对一门国际急诊医学教学课程进行持续改进是否会提高受众的认知度和接受度。
在4年时间里,我们在西非加纳举办的急诊医学研讨会上进行了调查。在2003年、2004年和2006年,进行了研讨会干预,包括内容修改(讲座主题/工作坊)、受众调整(小组规模更小,为不同水平的提供者设计工作坊)和过程中修改(在2006年连续举办的两次研讨会上修改讲座技巧)。对调查回复进行分析,以确定哪些干预措施能带来更高的参与者满意度。在比较三组时,进行单向方差分析测试以确定这三年之间的差异。在比较两组时,针对年度方差进行莱文方差齐性检验,并根据该结果计算独立t检验。
单向方差分析测试表明,在与参与者对教员的认知相关的四个问题上,三组研讨会参与者(2003年、2004年、2006年)之间存在统计学上的显著差异。将2003年和2004年的汇总数据与2006年的数据(连续两次研讨会之间的受众调整和过程中修改)进行比较的独立t检验显示,参与者的接受度有统计学上的显著提高。数据表明,修改国际研讨会的内容和调整其针对的受众是确保参与者产生积极接受度的同等重要的工具。此外,数据表明,在2006年连续举办的两次研讨会之间进行的“过程中”修改使积极认知有统计学上的显著增加,促进了知识转移。
对调查进行统计分析并结合修改和干预可以提高国际教学项目中的参与者满意度。