Markhorst D G, Groeneveld A B J, Heethaar R M, Zonneveld E, Van Genderingen H R
Paediatric intensive care unit, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33(4):281-7. doi: 10.1080/03091900802451240.
This study was performed to assess the value of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) as an indicator of tidal (V(T)) and end expiratory lung volume (EELV).
EIT measurements were performed in seven healthy piglets during constant tidal volume ventilation at incremental and decremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels. Tidal impedance changes were calibrated to volume using V(T) calculated from flow at the airway opening. Simultaneously, calibrated respiratory inductive plethysmography was used to measure EELV changes, and used as a reference standard.
EIT systematically underestimated both V(T) and EELV changes when EELV deviated from the level at which it was calibrated. Calculated over the entire pressure-volume curve, EIT systematically underestimated V(T) by 28 ml, with a precision from -16 to 72 ml. EELV was systemically underestimated by 406 ml, with a precision of -38 to 849 ml. Nonlinear recruitment in the ventral regions of the lungs was the main cause of this underestimation.
Tidal and end-expiratory changes in pulmonary impedance reflect corresponding changes in lung volume, but the increasing underestimation with increasing lung volume should be taken into account in the analysis of EIT data.
本研究旨在评估电阻抗断层成像(EIT)作为潮气量(V(T))和呼气末肺容积(EELV)指标的价值。
在七只健康仔猪中进行EIT测量,在恒定潮气量通气期间,呼气末正压(PEEP)水平递增和递减。使用从气道开口处的流量计算得出的V(T)将潮气量阻抗变化校准为容积。同时,使用校准后的呼吸感应体积描记法测量EELV变化,并将其用作参考标准。
当EELV偏离其校准水平时,EIT系统地低估了V(T)和EELV的变化。在整个压力-容积曲线上计算得出,EIT系统地低估V(T) 28毫升,精度为-16至72毫升。EELV被系统地低估406毫升,精度为-38至849毫升。肺部腹侧区域的非线性再充盈是这种低估的主要原因。
肺阻抗的潮气量和呼气末变化反映了肺容积的相应变化,但在分析EIT数据时应考虑随着肺容积增加而出现的越来越大的低估情况。