Lafond Danik, Dimmock Mathilde, Champagne Annick, Descarreaux Martin
Département des sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2009 Apr;25(3):218-27. doi: 10.1080/09593980902776589.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence of breathing when measuring lumbar postural control during a clinical progressive lumbar stabilization test (LST) and to estimate the intrasession reliability of the LST. The lumbar postural control index was calculated by using a biofeedback pressure unit. The LST was performed in two different positions (crook lying and upright) and two respiratory conditions (apnea and breathing) by 20 healthy individuals. The intrasession reliability of the lumbar postural control index of one trial was estimated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on an Anova model. The results showed that the lumbar postural control index is similar between testing positions. There is an increase of the lumbar postural control index during breathing compared to the apnea. The reliability of the lumbar postural control index was fair to good (ICC 0.28-0.58). We also found that for the apnea, three trials had to be averaged to attain an ICC of 0.80 for both positions. The results of the present study indicate that the progressive LST can be similarly conducted in either supine or upright posture. Clinicians should be aware of the influence of breathing during LST. However, breathing could also serve as a clinical strategy to challenge lumbar spine postural control and stability during bracing therapeutic exercises.
本研究的目的是评估在临床渐进性腰椎稳定测试(LST)期间测量腰椎姿势控制时呼吸的影响,并估计LST的组内可靠性。腰椎姿势控制指数通过生物反馈压力装置计算得出。20名健康个体在两种不同姿势(屈膝卧位和直立位)和两种呼吸条件(屏气和呼吸)下进行LST。基于方差分析模型,用组内相关系数(ICC)估计一次试验中腰椎姿势控制指数的组内可靠性。结果表明,测试姿势之间的腰椎姿势控制指数相似。与屏气相比,呼吸时腰椎姿势控制指数增加。腰椎姿势控制指数的可靠性为中等至良好(ICC 0.28 - 0.58)。我们还发现,对于屏气情况,两个姿势均需平均三次试验才能使ICC达到0.80。本研究结果表明,渐进性LST可以在仰卧位或直立位同样进行。临床医生应意识到LST期间呼吸的影响。然而,呼吸也可作为一种临床策略,在支撑性治疗运动中挑战腰椎姿势控制和稳定性。