Pereira Hugo Maxwell, de Campos Tarcisio Folly, Santos Marcelo Bannwart, Cardoso Jefferson Rosa, Garcia Mauricio de Camargo, Cohen Moises
Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil.
Gait Posture. 2008 Nov;28(4):668-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
The importance of knee position for bodily stability is described by some authors, however Biodex Stability System (BSS) trials have not been used to assess the reliability and effects of different knee positions. The purposes of this study were to test the reliability of BSS indices using two knee positions in the measurement protocol (either permitting slight knee flexion or maintaining them locked in total extension) and to compare the BSS indices between these two knee positions. The measurements were taken of the Overall Stability Index (OSI), Anterior-Posterior Stability Index (APSI) and Medial-Lateral Stability Index (MLSI) during a 30s protocol which gradually and automatically increased in difficulty among 21 healthy female subjects (22.8+/-1.0 years old). The subjects performed four trials which, without visual feedback, permitted knee flexion as well as four trials which did not, in a randomized order. The first two trials in each set were used for familiarization only. Permitting slight flexion yielded better reliability results (OSI Intra-class Correlation Coefficient [ICC]=0.93, APSI ICC=0.90, MLSI ICC=0.89) than maintaining the knee in total extension (OSI ICC=0.88, APSI ICC=0.87, MLSI ICC=0.79), with good agreement in the Bland and Altman test. Moreover, permitted knee flexion in BSS presented better balance stability values for OSI (P=0.001) and APSI (P=0.024), however the MLSI did not present significant difference between positions (P=0.345).
一些作者描述了膝关节位置对身体稳定性的重要性,然而,Biodex稳定性系统(BSS)试验尚未用于评估不同膝关节位置的可靠性和效果。本研究的目的是在测量方案中使用两种膝关节位置(允许轻微膝关节屈曲或保持完全伸直锁定)来测试BSS指标的可靠性,并比较这两种膝关节位置之间的BSS指标。在21名健康女性受试者(22.8±1.0岁)中,在一个30秒的方案中测量总体稳定性指数(OSI)、前后稳定性指数(APSI)和内外侧稳定性指数(MLSI),该方案的难度逐渐自动增加。受试者进行了四次允许膝关节屈曲且无视觉反馈的试验以及四次不允许膝关节屈曲的试验,试验顺序随机。每组中的前两次试验仅用于熟悉。与保持膝关节完全伸直相比,允许轻微屈曲产生了更好的可靠性结果(OSI组内相关系数[ICC]=0.93,APSI ICC=0.90,MLSI ICC=0.89)(OSI ICC=0.88,APSI ICC=0.87,MLSI ICC=0.79),在Bland和Altman检验中一致性良好。此外,BSS中允许膝关节屈曲在OSI(P=0.001)和APSI(P=0.024)方面呈现出更好的平衡稳定性值,然而MLSI在不同位置之间没有显著差异(P=0.345)。