Suppr超能文献

火焰原子吸收光谱法测定油田水中的锂

[Determination of lithium in the oil field water by flame atomic absorption spectrometry].

作者信息

Yang Hong-Jun, Ye Xiu-Shen, Li Bing, Wu Zhi-Jian, Li Wu

机构信息

Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China.

出版信息

Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi. 2009 Jan;29(1):263-7.

Abstract

Flame atomic absorption spectrometry was applied to the determination of micro amount of lithium in the oil field water of certain area. In order to determine which method is more appropriate for the determination of lithium content in the oil field water, standard curve method and standard addition method were compared. The effects of dilution, coexistent ions, and deionizers on the determination were studied. For the determination of lithium content in the same diluted oil field water samples, there exist obvious differences between the results obtained from standard addition method and standard curve method. Standard addition method gives results with a larger error, whereas standard curve method gives more accurate results. It is difficult to eliminate the interferences when the standard addition method is used. The standard curve method is found to be more suitable for the determination of micro amount of lithium in the oil field water for its accuracy, simplicity, and feasibility. When the standard curve method is used, both the determined lithium concentration and the recovery change with the dilution extent of the oil field water. In order to get an accurate result, the oil field water sample should be diluted to 1/200 or less. In this case, the recovery by standard addition method ranges from 94.3% to 96.9%. When sodium phosphate or sodium chloride is used as the deionizer, the recovery by standard addition method ranges from 94.6% to 98.6%, or from 94.2% to 96.3%. In the determination of lithium content in oil field water, there are larger experimental errors without the addition of any deionizer. When the concentration of coexistent ions is within an allowed range, the addition of sodium phosphate as a deionizer can eliminate the interferences of the coexistent ions with the determination of the lithium content. If sodium chloride is used as a deionizer, a more accurate result can be obtained when the sodium content in the samples is near the sodium content in the standard solutions. In general, under suitable experimental conditions, sodium chloride can be used as the deionizer for the determination of lithium content in the oil field water.

摘要

采用火焰原子吸收光谱法测定某地区油田水中微量锂。为确定哪种方法更适合测定油田水中锂含量,对标准曲线法和标准加入法进行了比较。研究了稀释、共存离子及去离子剂对测定的影响。对于相同稀释倍数的油田水样品中锂含量的测定,标准加入法和标准曲线法所得结果存在明显差异。标准加入法误差较大,而标准曲线法结果更准确。使用标准加入法时难以消除干扰。发现标准曲线法因其准确性、简便性和可行性更适合测定油田水中微量锂。使用标准曲线法时,测定的锂浓度和回收率均随油田水稀释程度而变化。为获得准确结果,油田水样品应稀释至1/200或更低。在此情况下,标准加入法的回收率为94.3%至96.9%。当使用磷酸钠或氯化钠作为去离子剂时,标准加入法的回收率分别为94.6%至98.6%或94.2%至96.3%。在测定油田水中锂含量时,不添加任何去离子剂时实验误差较大。当共存离子浓度在允许范围内时,添加磷酸钠作为去离子剂可消除共存离子对锂含量测定的干扰。若使用氯化钠作为去离子剂,当样品中钠含量接近标准溶液中钠含量时可获得更准确结果。一般来说,在合适的实验条件下,氯化钠可作为测定油田水中锂含量的去离子剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验