Suppr超能文献

通过一项全区域调查评估关键临床利益相关者对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院外诊断和治疗的态度与看法。

Evaluation of attitudes and perceptions of key clinical stakeholders regarding out-of-hospital diagnosis and treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients using a region-wide survey.

作者信息

Rajabali N A, Tsuyuki R T, Sookram S, Simpson S H, Welsh R C

机构信息

Epidemiology Coordinating and Research (EPICORE) Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2009 May;26(5):371-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.066126.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), prehospital management (PHM) may improve clinical outcomes through a reduction in reperfusion delay. The purpose of this study was to evaluate perceptions among healthcare stakeholder groups relating to the barriers and facilitators of implementing a PHM programme.

METHODS

A 25-question cross-sectional survey, using a four-point Likert scale assessing barriers and facilitators of PHM, was distributed to paramedics, cardiologists, emergency physicians and emergency nurses within the Edmonton region, where prehospital STEMI treatment is established. The proportion of responses on each question was compared and differences between groups were determined using chi(2) and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

57% (355/619) of subjects responded: 69% paramedics, 50% cardiologists, 54% emergency physicians and 45% emergency nurses. A majority believed PHM reduced treatment delays in both rural (96-100%) and urban (86-96%) areas, while decreasing patient mortality (paramedics 97%, cardiologists 74%, emergency physicians 85%, emergency nurses 88%). Regarding the capability of paramedics to deliver PHM, paramedics 25%, cardiologists 33%, emergency physicians 67%, and emergency nurses 47% stated that urban paramedics are better equipped and trained than rural paramedics. Although 81% of paramedics supported the possibility of PHM delivery without physician overview, 0% of cardiologists, 98% of emergency physicians and 95% emergency nurses agreed. A majority (71-88%) favoured mandatory signed informed consent.

CONCLUSIONS

While stakeholders agreed on the benefits of PHM, perceptual differences existed on paramedics' ability to deliver PHM without physician overview. Addressing real and perceived barriers through communication and educational programmes may enhance PHM within this healthcare region and facilitate the implementation of PHM programmes.

摘要

引言

在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中,院前管理(PHM)可通过减少再灌注延迟来改善临床结局。本研究的目的是评估医疗利益相关者群体对实施PHM计划的障碍和促进因素的看法。

方法

在已开展院前STEMI治疗的埃德蒙顿地区,向护理人员、心脏病专家、急诊医生和急诊护士发放了一份包含25个问题的横断面调查问卷,使用四点李克特量表评估PHM的障碍和促进因素。比较每个问题的回答比例,并使用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验确定组间差异。

结果

57%(355/619)的受试者做出了回应:护理人员为69%,心脏病专家为50%,急诊医生为54%,急诊护士为45%。大多数人认为PHM减少了农村(96 - 100%)和城市(86 - 96%)地区的治疗延迟,同时降低了患者死亡率(护理人员为97%,心脏病专家为74%,急诊医生为85%,急诊护士为88%)。关于护理人员实施PHM的能力,25%的护理人员、33%的心脏病专家、67%的急诊医生和47%的急诊护士表示城市护理人员比农村护理人员装备更好、培训更充分。尽管81%的护理人员支持在没有医生监督的情况下实施PHM的可能性,但心脏病专家中0%、急诊医生中98%和急诊护士中95%表示同意。大多数人(71 - 88%)赞成强制签署知情同意书。

结论

虽然利益相关者认同PHM的益处,但对于护理人员在没有医生监督的情况下实施PHM的能力存在认知差异。通过沟通和教育计划解决实际和认知障碍,可能会加强该医疗区域内的PHM,并促进PHM计划的实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验