Garvey Patrick B, Ricciardelli Edward J, Gampper Thomas
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2009 May;62(5):482-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31818c18ed.
The search for less invasive surgical techniques to address the effects of facial aging led to the development of barbed polypropylene sutures for facial suspension. Theoretical advantages of these "threadlifts" included limited scarring, rapid recovery, relative safety, and reduced cost when compared with a standard rhytidectomy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing threadlifts to determine the actual complication rates, the durability of results, and the rates of reoperative surgery. A single surgeon's initial 2-year experience with 72 patients undergoing threadlifts was retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patient demographical and clinical data, operative information, and postoperative outcomes data were compiled and evaluated. A total of 72 thread lifts were performed by 1 surgeon over a 24-month period. Of these patients, 76% underwent threadlift alone, whereas concomitant procedures were performed in 24% of patients. Minor complications were common and usually self-limited. Forty-two percent of patients underwent a secondary procedure after primary threadlift, an average of 8.4 months after the original surgery. Thirty-one percent of patients required revisional surgery for cosmetic reasons an average of 8.7 months after their threadlift. Eleven percent of the patients ultimately required removal of palpable threads. Threadlift is a safe procedure associated with minor complications. Rates of revisional surgery for cosmesis are high after threadlift. Time to revisional surgery for cosmesis is short. Results achieved by threadlift are subtle and short-lived. Threadlift is not a minimally invasive replacement of surgical rhytidectomy. Patients should understand the limitations of this technique and its high rates of revisional surgery.
对面部衰老影响采用侵入性较小的手术技术的探索,促使了用于面部悬吊的倒刺聚丙烯缝线的发展。与标准除皱术相比,这些“线雕”的理论优势包括瘢痕形成有限、恢复迅速、相对安全以及成本降低。本研究的目的是评估接受线雕患者的手术效果,以确定实际的并发症发生率、效果的持久性以及再次手术率。回顾性分析了一位外科医生对72例接受线雕患者的最初2年经验。收集并评估了术前患者的人口统计学和临床数据、手术信息以及术后结果数据。在24个月期间,一位外科医生共进行了72例线雕手术。在这些患者中,76%仅接受了线雕,而24%的患者同时进行了其他手术。轻微并发症很常见,且通常为自限性。42%的患者在初次线雕后接受了二次手术,平均在初次手术后8.4个月。31%的患者因美容原因需要再次手术,平均在其线雕后8.7个月。11%的患者最终需要取出可触及的缝线。线雕是一种安全的手术,但伴有轻微并发症。线雕后因美容进行再次手术的比例较高。因美容进行再次手术的时间较短。线雕取得的效果细微且短暂。线雕并非手术除皱术的微创替代方法。患者应了解该技术的局限性及其较高的再次手术率。