Cohen Steven P, Bogduk Nikolai, Dragovich Anthony, Buckenmaier Chester C, Griffith Scott, Kurihara Connie, Raymond Jolynne, Richter Philip J, Williams Necia, Yaksh Tony L
Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21029, USA.
Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1116-26. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a05aa0.
Recent evidence implicates the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor as a major cause of radiculopathy. Yet, whereas open-label studies with systemically delivered tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have yielded positive results, a placebo-controlled study failed to demonstrate efficacy. One variable that may have contributed to poor outcomes is low drug levels at the site of nerve inflammation. To date, no studies have evaluated the efficacy or safety of epidurally administered anti-tumor necrosis factor agents.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study was conducted to evaluate an epidural tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. Twenty-four patients with subacute lumbosacral radiculopathy were randomly assigned to receive two transforaminal epidural injections of 2, 4, or 6 mg of entanercept 2 weeks apart in successive groups of eight. In each group, two patients received epidural saline. A parallel epidural canine safety study was conducted using the same injection doses and paradigm as in the clinical study.
The animal and human safety studies revealed no behavioral, neurologic, or histologic evidence of drug-related toxicity. In the clinical arm, significant improvements in leg and back pain were collectively noted for the etanercept-treated patients, but not for the saline group, one month after treatment. One patient in the saline group (17%), six patients in the 2-mg group (100%), and four patients each in the 4-mg and 6-mg groups (67%) reported at least 50% reduction in leg pain and a positive global perceived effect one month after treatment. Six months after treatment, the beneficial effects persisted in all but one patient.
Epidural entanercept holds promise as a treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
最近有证据表明,炎性细胞因子肿瘤坏死因子是神经根病的主要病因。然而,尽管全身性给予肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的开放标签研究取得了阳性结果,但一项安慰剂对照研究未能证明其有效性。一个可能导致疗效不佳的变量是神经炎症部位的药物水平较低。迄今为止,尚无研究评估硬膜外给予抗肿瘤坏死因子药物的疗效或安全性。
进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、剂量反应研究,以评估硬膜外肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂。24例亚急性腰骶神经根病患者被随机分配,依次分为8人一组,接受间隔2周的两次经椎间孔硬膜外注射2mg、4mg或6mg的依那西普。每组中有两名患者接受硬膜外注射生理盐水。使用与临床研究相同的注射剂量和模式进行了一项平行的硬膜外犬类安全性研究。
动物和人体安全性研究均未发现与药物相关毒性的行为、神经或组织学证据。在临床组中,治疗1个月后,依那西普治疗的患者腿部和背部疼痛总体上有显著改善,而生理盐水组则没有。生理盐水组中有1名患者(17%)、2mg组中有6名患者(100%)、4mg和6mg组各有4名患者(67%)报告治疗1个月后腿部疼痛至少减轻50%且总体感觉效果良好。治疗6个月后,除1名患者外,所有患者的有益效果均持续存在。
硬膜外注射依那西普有望成为治疗腰骶神经根病的一种方法。