Westh H, Lisby G, Breysse F, Böddinghaus B, Chomarat M, Gant V, Goglio A, Raglio A, Schuster H, Stuber F, Wissing H, Hoeft A
Department of Clinical Microbiology 445, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Jun;15(6):544-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02736.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
Severe sepsis is increasingly a cause of death. Rapid and correct initial antimicrobial treatment reduces mortality. The aetiological agent(s) cannot always be found in blood cultures (BCs). A novel multiplex PCR test (SeptiFast (alpha version)) that allows identification of 20 bacterial and fungal species directly from blood was used, comparatively with BC, in a multicentre trial of patients with suspected bacterial or fungal sepsis. Five hundred and fifty-eight paired samples from 359 patients were evaluated. The rate of positivity was 17% for BC and 26% for SeptiFast. Ninety-six microorganisms were isolated with BC, and 186 microorganisms were identified with SeptiFast; 231 microorganisms were found by combining the two tests. Of the 96 isolates identified with BC, 22 isolates were considered to be contaminants. Of the remaining 74 non-contaminant BC isolates available for comparison with SeptiFast, 50 were identified as a species identical to the species identified with SeptiFast in the paired sample. Of the remaining 24 BC isolates for which the species, identified in the BC, could not be detected in the paired SeptiFast sample, 18 BC isolates were identified as a species included in the SeptiFast master list, and six BC isolates were identified as a species not included in the SeptiFast master list. With SeptiFast, 186 microorganisms were identified, 12 of which were considered to be contaminants. Of the 174 clinically relevant microorganisms identified with SeptiFast, 50 (29%) were detected by BC. More than half of the remaining microorganisms identified with SeptiFast (but not isolated after BC) were also found in routine cultures of other relevant samples taken from the patients. Future clinical studies should assess whether the use of SeptiFast is of significant advantage in the detection of bloodstream pathogens.
严重脓毒症日益成为死亡原因。快速且正确的初始抗菌治疗可降低死亡率。病因病原体并非总能在血培养(BC)中找到。在一项针对疑似细菌性或真菌性脓毒症患者的多中心试验中,使用了一种新型多重聚合酶链反应检测方法(SeptiFast(α版本)),该方法可直接从血液中鉴定出20种细菌和真菌物种,并与血培养进行比较。对来自359例患者的558对样本进行了评估。血培养的阳性率为17%,SeptiFast的阳性率为26%。血培养分离出96种微生物,SeptiFast鉴定出186种微生物;两种检测方法联合共发现231种微生物。在血培养鉴定出的96株菌株中,22株被认为是污染物。在其余可与SeptiFast进行比较的74株非污染血培养分离株中,50株被鉴定为与配对样本中SeptiFast鉴定出的物种相同。在其余24株血培养分离株中,其在血培养中鉴定出的物种在配对的SeptiFast样本中未检测到,其中18株血培养分离株被鉴定为SeptiFast主列表中包含的物种,6株血培养分离株被鉴定为SeptiFast主列表中未包含的物种。使用SeptiFast鉴定出186种微生物,其中12种被认为是污染物。在SeptiFast鉴定出的174种临床相关微生物中,50种(29%)通过血培养检测到。SeptiFast鉴定出的其余微生物(但血培养后未分离出)中,超过一半也在从患者采集的其他相关样本的常规培养中被发现。未来的临床研究应评估使用SeptiFast在检测血流病原体方面是否具有显著优势。