Araya Tadesse, Ekehammar Bo
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Scand J Psychol. 2009 Aug;50(4):325-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00720.x. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
We investigated the effects of unobtrusively primed constructs that were evocative of tolerance (e.g., tolerant, nonprejudiced) on subsequent task performances and found, contrary to our expectation, contrast effects in the judgment of an ambiguous behavioral description (Study 1 and 2). Suspecting that these results might be the outcome of social-comparison processes, in Study 3, we attempted to corroborate our findings by providing the participants with either an explicit or implicit comparison standard. The results showed that the participants who were provided with the implicit comparison standard evaluated the target behavior as more intolerant as compared to those with the explicit or no comparison standard. The results are discussed in relation to the moderating role of automatic social-comparison processes in the incidence of assimilation and contrast effects and the reduction of prejudice.
我们研究了以不易察觉的方式启动的、唤起宽容概念(如宽容的、无偏见的)对后续任务表现的影响,结果发现,与我们的预期相反,在对一个模糊行为描述的判断中出现了对比效应(研究1和研究2)。由于怀疑这些结果可能是社会比较过程的结果,在研究3中,我们试图通过为参与者提供明确或隐含的比较标准来证实我们的发现。结果表明,与那些有明确比较标准或没有比较标准的参与者相比,被提供隐含比较标准的参与者对目标行为的评价更不宽容。我们将结合自动社会比较过程在同化和对比效应的发生以及偏见减少中的调节作用来讨论这些结果。