Bell-Krotoski J
Rehabilitation Research Department, Gillis W. Long Hansen's Disease Center, Carville, Louisiana.
Hand Clin. 1991 Aug;7(3):527-46.
What is needed is a quick, practical, cost-effective measurement instrument that can be depended upon to provide clear and reliable information regarding normal versus abnormal function. In the future, objective measurements will enable review of patient peripheral nerve injuries and neuropathies in treatment populations and will allow direct correlation of peripheral nerve status with treatment. Important points can be summarized as follows: (1) With newer technology, improved testing instruments are possible that can both expand understanding of clinical conditions and in the end simplify testing through stimulus control with errors eliminated. (2) With understanding of the requirements for controlled stimuli, clinicians can assess the objectivity of any current and future test instrument and/or can use an instrument in as repeatable a method as possible within its identified limitations. (3) Many current test instruments have been helpful in providing useful clinical information, but better instrument control is needed to improve the quality of information and to develop minimum recommendations for testing. (4) Newer instruments that have undergone instrument reliability testing should be compared with existing instruments that have met the requirements for reliability in a valid protocol before they can be said to have greater or less value in detecting clinical status. (5) Data regarding reliability studies should be available and should not be taken at face value alone; just because a manufacturer states reliability studies have been done, or a paper concludes an instrument is reliable, does not mean the instrument or testing protocol meets the requirements for scientific design. (6) A test instrument needs to be as sensitive as the system it is trying to measure; most currently available instruments apply stimuli too gross to sensitively detect abnormal function, or to sensitively detect early changes (improvement or worsening) in clinical status. (7) For the first time there exists the possibility of computer-controlled instruments for evaluating long-standing physiologic concepts, and there will soon be an explosion of newer information under which all instruments should be considered. (8) The Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments are one of the most objective instruments (if not the most) and are available for clinical testing either for detailed mapping or for screening extent and degree of nerve pathology; combination with electroneuromyography is recommended in determining level of involvement.
我们需要一种快速、实用、经济高效的测量仪器,它必须能够提供有关正常与异常功能的清晰可靠信息。未来,客观测量将有助于评估治疗人群中的患者周围神经损伤和神经病变,并能直接将周围神经状态与治疗效果相关联。要点总结如下:(1)随着技术的更新,有望开发出改进的测试仪器,既能加深对临床状况的理解,最终又能通过消除误差的刺激控制来简化测试。(2)了解了受控刺激的要求后,临床医生可以评估任何现有和未来测试仪器的客观性,或者在仪器确定的局限性内尽可能以可重复的方法使用仪器。(3)许多现有测试仪器在提供有用的临床信息方面发挥了作用,但需要更好的仪器控制来提高信息质量,并制定最低测试建议。(4)经过仪器可靠性测试的新型仪器,在能够说其在检测临床状态方面具有更大或更小价值之前,应与已在有效方案中达到可靠性要求的现有仪器进行比较。(5)关于可靠性研究的数据应可获取,且不应仅从表面价值看待;仅仅因为制造商声称已进行可靠性研究,或者一篇论文得出仪器可靠的结论,并不意味着该仪器或测试方案符合科学设计要求。(6)测试仪器需要与它所测量的系统一样灵敏;目前大多数可用仪器施加的刺激过于粗略,无法灵敏地检测异常功能,或灵敏地检测临床状态的早期变化(改善或恶化)。(7)首次有可能使用计算机控制的仪器来评估长期存在的生理学概念,并且很快会有大量新信息涌现,所有仪器都应在此背景下进行考量。(8)Semmes-Weinstein单丝是最客观的仪器之一(如果不是最客观的话),可用于临床测试,无论是进行详细绘图还是筛查神经病变的范围和程度;在确定受累程度时,建议与神经电生理检查相结合。