Helle-Valle Thomas, Remme Espen W, Lyseggen Erik, Pettersen Eirik, Vartdal Trond, Opdahl Anders, Smith Hans-Jørgen, Osman Nael F, Ihlen Halfdan, Edvardsen Thor, Smiseth Otto A
Department of Cardiology and Institute for Surgical Research, Rikshospitalet University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 Jul;297(1):H257-67. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01116.2008. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
Left ventricular (LV) circumferential strain and rotation have been introduced as clinical markers of myocardial function. This study investigates how regional LV apical rotation and strain can be used in combination to assess function in the infarcted ventricle. In healthy subjects (n = 15) and patients with myocardial infarction (n = 23), LV apical segmental rotation and strain were measured from apical short-axis recordings by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and MRI tagging. Infarct extent was determined by late gadolinium enhancement MRI. To investigate mechanisms of changes in strain and rotation, we used a mathematical finite element simulation model of the LV. Mean apical rotation and strain by STE were lower in patients than in healthy subjects (9.0 +/- 4.9 vs. 12.9 +/- 3.5 degrees and -13.9 +/- 10.7 vs. -23.8 +/- 2.3%, respectively, P < 0.05). In patients, regional strain was reduced in proportion to segmental infarct extent (r = 0.80, P < 0.0001). Regional rotation, however, was similar in the center of the infarct and in remote viable myocardium. Minimum and maximum rotations were found at the infarct borders: minimum rotation at the border zone opposite to the direction of apical rotation, and maximum rotation at the border zone in the direction of rotation. The simulation model reproduced the clinical findings and indicated that the dissociation between rotation and strain was caused by mechanical interactions between infarcted and viable myocardium. Systolic strain reflects regional myocardial function and infarct extent, whereas systolic rotation defines infarct borders in the LV apical region. Regional rotation, however, has limited ability to quantify regional myocardial dysfunction.
左心室(LV)圆周应变和旋转已被引入作为心肌功能的临床标志物。本研究探讨了如何联合使用局部左心室心尖旋转和应变来评估梗死心室的功能。在健康受试者(n = 15)和心肌梗死患者(n = 23)中,通过斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)和MRI标记从心尖短轴记录中测量左心室心尖节段旋转和应变。梗死范围通过延迟钆增强MRI确定。为了研究应变和旋转变化的机制,我们使用了左心室的数学有限元模拟模型。患者通过STE测量的平均心尖旋转和应变低于健康受试者(分别为9.0±4.9与12.9±3.5度,以及-13.9±10.7与-23.8±2.3%,P < 0.05)。在患者中,局部应变与节段性梗死范围成比例降低(r = 0.80,P < 0.0001)。然而,梗死中心和远处存活心肌的局部旋转相似。在梗死边界处发现最小和最大旋转:在与心尖旋转方向相反的边界区域为最小旋转,在旋转方向的边界区域为最大旋转。模拟模型再现了临床发现,并表明旋转和应变之间的分离是由梗死心肌和存活心肌之间的机械相互作用引起的。收缩期应变反映局部心肌功能和梗死范围,而收缩期旋转定义左心室心尖区域的梗死边界。然而,局部旋转量化局部心肌功能障碍的能力有限。