Suppr超能文献

面瘫患者行眼睑支撑术后的满意度。

Patient satisfaction after lid loading in facial palsy.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Helios Clinics Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Nov;266(11):1727-31. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0981-0. Epub 2009 Apr 26.

Abstract

Paralytic lagophthalmos is treated by pretarsal implantation of eyelid weights consisting either of rigid gold weights or flexible platinum chains. Functional results being good, subjective patient satisfaction has been examined only by a small number of studies. The aim of our study, conducted by means of a questionnaire, was to assess subjective patient satisfaction after implantation of different eyelid implants. Questionnaires were sent to 42 patients treated by pretarsal implantation of a gold weight (group 1) and 51 patients with a pretarsally fixed platinum chain (group 2). In total, 46 response sheets were evaluated (16 x gold weight, 30 x platinum chain) and the results were compared. In group 1, 75% of patients were very satisfied to satisfied with the overall result. In group 2, 100% of patients were very satisfied to satisfied with the overall result. In group 1, an infection occurred in 6.5% of patients, an extrusion in 6.5%, and a change of vision in 31%. In group 2, inflammation occurred in 13%, extrusion in 0%, and a change of vision occurred in 13% of patients. On a visual analogous scale from 1 to 10 (1, very good; 10, very poor), group 1 assessed the cosmetic result with an average grade of 3.8 and the functional result with an average grade of 3.1. Group 2 assessed the cosmetic result with the grade 2.9 and the functional result with grade 3.0. The implantation of an eyelid weight for treatment of paralytic lagophthalmos was assessed as positive by a majority of patients. When compared with conventional gold implants, patients who have been treated with a flexible platinum chain are overall more satisfied and have a more favorable subjective view of the cosmetic results.

摘要

动眼性上睑下垂的治疗方法是在前睑植入眼睑重量,包括刚性金重量或柔性铂链。尽管功能结果良好,但仅有少数研究检查了患者的主观满意度。我们通过问卷调查进行的研究旨在评估不同眼睑植入物植入后的主观患者满意度。我们向 42 名接受前睑植入金重量(第 1 组)和 51 名接受前睑固定铂链(第 2 组)治疗的患者发送了问卷。总共评估了 46 份回复表(16 个金重量,30 个铂链),并比较了结果。在第 1 组中,75%的患者对整体结果非常满意或满意。在第 2 组中,100%的患者对整体结果非常满意或满意。在第 1 组中,6.5%的患者发生感染,6.5%的患者发生挤出,31%的患者视力发生变化。在第 2 组中,13%的患者发生炎症,0%的患者发生挤出,13%的患者视力发生变化。在 1 到 10 的视觉类比量表上(1,非常好;10,非常差),第 1 组评估美容结果的平均得分为 3.8,功能结果的平均得分为 3.1。第 2 组评估美容结果的平均得分为 2.9,功能结果的平均得分为 3.0。大多数患者认为眼睑重量植入术治疗动眼性上睑下垂是有效的。与传统的金植入物相比,接受柔性铂链治疗的患者总体上更满意,对美容效果的主观看法更为有利。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验