Suppr超能文献

骨质疏松症诊断与治疗策略中的关键点

Critical points in strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

作者信息

Lorenc Roman S, Misiorowski Waldemar, Karczmarewicz Elzbieta

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Experimental Medicine, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw.

出版信息

Endokrynol Pol. 2009 Mar-Apr;60(2):124-33.

Abstract

Current treatment decisions for osteoporosis depend on the fracture risk calculated based on the results of comprehensive diagnostic procedures [clinical risk factors (CRF), densitometry (BMD), morphometry, and bone turnover markers (BTM)]. Recently developed fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) represents an important new achievement as a 10-year fracture risk calculation based on femoral neck densitometry and age combined with independent clinical fracture risk factors. FRAX presents several options: FRAX BMI (body mass index) is advocated as a helpful screening tool to identify the group of patients with high fracture risk, independently of access to densitometry and FRAX, utilizing hip densitometry. In both cases, the probability of major fractures or hip fractures are calculated during performed diagnostic evaluations. Operating FRAX algorithm does not include spinal bone mineral density, which is its main limitation. With the aim of improvement of anti-fracture efficacy of therapeutic management of osteoporosis, we have extended our discussion to three integral elements of existent strategy: 1) screening outlines, 2) principles of drug selection, and 3) treatment benefit evaluation. Since osteoporosis is a chronic disease, long-term adherence to the treatment is important. The suitability of the drug, the patient's preference, tolerability, and convenience should all be considered. Anti-catabolic drugs are most appropriate in patients with high bone turnover, while anabolic drugs demonstrate efficacy irrespective of bone turnover. BMD measurement is most widely used for long-term assessment of the efficacy of osteoporosis treatment. The measurements of bone turnover markers (BTMs) can be considered a useful shortterm (at 3 months) monitoring tool in selected patients. In both BTM and BMD, the least significant change (LSC) method should be used for interpretation of the results. Fractures are not a reliable clinical endpoint for evaluating the effectiveness of therapy in individual patients because of their stochastic nature. If fractures occur, however, the need for drug change and additional non-pharmacological treatment (fall prevention, balance training, muscle strengthening) should always be considered.

摘要

目前骨质疏松症的治疗决策取决于基于综合诊断程序结果(临床风险因素、骨密度测定、形态测量和骨转换标志物)计算出的骨折风险。最近开发的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)是一项重要的新成果,它基于股骨颈骨密度测定和年龄,并结合独立的临床骨折风险因素来计算10年骨折风险。FRAX提供了几种选择:FRAX体重指数(BMI)被倡导作为一种有用的筛查工具,用于识别骨折风险高的患者群体,无论是否能够进行骨密度测定和使用FRAX,利用髋部骨密度测定即可。在这两种情况下,在进行诊断评估时都会计算主要骨折或髋部骨折的概率。运行FRAX算法不包括脊柱骨矿物质密度,这是其主要局限性。为了提高骨质疏松症治疗管理的抗骨折疗效,我们将讨论扩展到现有策略的三个整体要素:1)筛查大纲,2)药物选择原则,3)治疗效益评估。由于骨质疏松症是一种慢性病,长期坚持治疗很重要。应考虑药物的适用性、患者的偏好、耐受性和便利性。抗分解代谢药物最适合骨转换高的患者,而合成代谢药物无论骨转换如何都显示出疗效。骨密度测量最广泛用于骨质疏松症治疗疗效的长期评估。在选定的患者中,骨转换标志物的测量可被视为一种有用的短期(3个月)监测工具。在骨转换标志物和骨密度测量中,都应使用最小有意义变化(LSC)方法来解释结果。由于骨折具有随机性,骨折不是评估个体患者治疗效果的可靠临床终点。然而,如果发生骨折,应始终考虑更换药物和采取额外的非药物治疗(预防跌倒、平衡训练、肌肉强化)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验